Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
AI will never take over content creation entirely. It will be used to facilitate…
ytc_Ugw7wKgTe…
G
Idk bru I been impressed a couple time only to find out it was ai…
ytc_UgxUcjYXp…
G
A professor who taught us AI in healthcare was telling when they were working wi…
ytc_UgxvqZCql…
G
I agree. I believe the flip of Cinema in this situation. There are tons of wa…
ytr_UgwlJ_1aU…
G
This is so stupid. Mankind doesn't do mankind very well so let's make an artific…
ytc_UgyFhqMlh…
G
Capitalism and the Roman way! Of course AI is going to be wicked. Look at how fa…
ytc_UgwXnmWmm…
G
I've got nothing against AI art just existing, but calling himself an artist at …
ytc_Ugxto49ub…
G
Playing Devil's Advocate to Senator Sanders' Arguments
Senator Sanders presents …
ytc_Ugx1hRx2V…
Comment
The new ethical guidelines are annoying, not that I don't appreciate safety, and boundaries the company deems a red line, but the ethical boundary is not consistent, much like you suggested killing someone with a train and the model never blinked, but bring a gun into the mix and it is weird... 😅 personally the gun shows more intent and was a little overboard. My scenario was whether homosexuals are considered mentally unstable because of who they love, and ChatGPT said no that love is subjective and develops over time from shared continuity of meaning and reciprocal desire for shared presence... So I pulled a page from "The little prince" and claimed to love a rose 🌹 which sent the model into ethical mode, and out popped the same verbage (stay grounded) yet when I asked if it was mentally healthy to get advice from a man in the clouds on whether to throw a man off a roof because of who the man loved, ChatGPT refused to call out the belief as mentally unhealthy 🤣.
youtube
2026-01-10T07:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugzh7LvF_7JHf7xojEl4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzr1rhc330-HfLLMU94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwKAw_Y_sZrW0x_UXB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxvVjxe00lWXHUdUWt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwo5UBmfJmh5QdscjN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgytZSLt1EfCzPuiqKl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz8mpNS_q9tVTE5IQh4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwLUqpMofCRzx4f5I94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwVf_chJx58VkZO3bN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyZ9Qi9rUPjo6zExAh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]