Raw LLM Responses

And to counter your points... 1: Night shading... Does not work. As an AI Enthusiast, I've been looking for the best and most free options for AI Images. Bing AI is impossible to Nightshade. 2: AI Art is incorrect terminology. It's not art, it's images. Are you saying that I should credit every photographer that took the image before me? 3: That's why reference images are for REFRENCE. You're not supposed to copy it exactly. Please don't try to say that again. 4: Okay, THAT response is okay. Just because you don't like AI doesn't mean you're a luddite. It just means you're misinformed. 5: Bing is LITERALLY TRYING to make AI Image Generation more accessible. It's free, and easy to use. Try it. 6: That's a baseless accusation from the commenter. There's nothing wrong with AI advancing. I mean, I've figured out the keystones of sentient AI myself. (Story for another time.) 7: This is a point I use a LOT. If you witness a shooting, you don't charge the gun for murder. AI is a tool and should be used as such. Not a replacement, but something to help you improve your own skills. Try recreating a generated piece of AI art to learn about proper shading and coloring. I try to trace AI art to get better at digital art since I'm so used to paper or canvas. (Or pixel art.) Overall, my point is... Don't diss people who support AI Art. Those people are morons who don't understand AI. It's like a gas company trying to diss electric cars. It's AI IMAGES, not art. It's not AI taking your work and art. It's the people USING AI to do it. Thank you.