Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
As a disabled person, ai slop isn't making anything better for disabled people. …
ytr_Ugximm40B…
G
AI should not get the benefit over human art and they got therefore unreasonably…
ytc_Ugw3yNOrV…
G
@jss-i5dSeriously! Almost everyone in the comments is shaming Ai users and ignor…
ytr_Ugy2B82tH…
G
They do it because this is the easiest time to lay people off, you get to blame …
rdc_czlucmb
G
the way Aliagents structures their AI agents is groundbreaking, can’t wait to se…
ytc_UgwuvjZNp…
G
@kaczynski2333 You're right, it's more than just a search engine, but it is stil…
ytr_UgzUDfozk…
G
@BatPlays-vyea, I need to.
I don't want to give away too many details, but a …
ytr_UgyuCWWjR…
G
What is this gibberish. The only sad thing is that one person died. However, I d…
ytc_Ugzbco4Lz…
Comment
As a professional software engineer who uses AI tools daily — from autonomous agents to integrated assistants in code editors — I find it hard to take seriously the claim that a future AI couldn’t be shut down. These systems ultimately run on physical servers powered by electricity. From a software engineering perspective (even without being an AI researcher), it seems extremely unlikely that there would be no way to disable or dismantle a system we ourselves built. Kill switches, air-gapped environments, power cutoffs, and hardware destruction are all trivial fallback options.
There’s also a huge leap in assuming an AI could somehow “escape” its containment by magically rewriting the entire internet stack, bypassing decades of hardened protocols, operating systems, and network security. Yes, we’ve seen concerning incidents (like the recent Anthropic research showing models can be prompted to take unauthorized actions when given tools), but that’s still a far cry from an AI autonomously breaking out of its sandbox and seizing control of unrelated infrastructure.
youtube
AI Jobs
2025-11-20T13:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyoQSVvBHxNAec2TSp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzw6-JORR53HykCMfN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyMJXdagIBgbscKKqF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxYaYceVlfdfeIkERN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx-E_UybuePPqCRVF14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxmYO49m6g4zp3Tvq94AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx4AliBBBEkUc5e9wF4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy8vckkVQrnHS1BERl4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxaEsdV4nW830veEgh4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxo0fZYqVQCY8s94-N4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}
]