Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I have had some rather edgy arguments with Gemini (I really hate when it's toein…
ytc_UgwUm82tn…
G
"Why aren't you doing what I'm doing?" because some people actually have standar…
ytc_UgwSvT4hH…
G
It isn't getting 3 times better though. Every new LLM version is 100-1000 times …
ytc_UgwF7owfW…
G
It just occurred to me that Uber is actually a Russian military AI project. Taki…
rdc_dwv67a2
G
You are to old to know anything about ai. Chat bots fail and customers want to s…
ytc_UgwuKKzkC…
G
Again auto pilot just like in planes is to give you a little of leaniancy so it'…
ytc_Ugzn0kHt6…
G
There are just scared that AI will take there JOB. Why pay salary bmwhen you can…
ytc_UgwZ43f9l…
G
@jagger1008 No, it isn't like that at all. When i personally look at art, i lik…
ytr_UgyoouaSV…
Comment
"harmful" decisions: in real public decisions, there are always trade-offs; and difficult if not impossible to find a decision everyone will agree isn't harmful. If a decision no one considers harmful doesn't exist, demanding it of AI is demanding something no human institution has ever achieved. The only solution is process: audits, transparency etc. but these are things people hate doing.
"biased" decisions: around 70% of people think the BBC is biased but can't agree which way; it splits round 35% say it's left, 35% say it's right, 30% say balanced. A minority occupies the "unbiased" midpoint – a statistical artefact of a dumb-bell distribution. Same problem applies to AI: "biased" relative to what?
Humans form political parties, schools of thought, religions etc. because we can't all agree and forcing an average will frustrate anyone not at that average point.
History shows we never agree, but that won't stop utopians in ivory towers insisting one day we might. DeGrasse Tyson shows this clearly.
youtube
AI Governance
2026-03-25T11:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwIqNU_TMR537ePFTZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"society","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwvSMYiYT_IuovoE314AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwY-jQW29BYypAf75F4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz5TFxae2j2uFRv29R4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgynE9iH1O3nO18qyCt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy09ItQRfK9BBvo-8p4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxt_5jb-i6PwtrWlz14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyX_x6pmFaQoqqHYGt4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzK0YstJ0vgqcNzZEN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyOoLGrCvVUx8LfmrJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]