Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
As a class nerd who always did his homework on time and DIDN'T do such blasphemy…
rdc_mvvipvl
G
Good video, but you can't tell me that the State isn't using facial recognition …
ytc_Ugxq6-PXF…
G
I'm leaving this shill site. I am the only one here who has written AI. Adios.…
ytc_Ugw11j9P_…
G
me deciding to be nice to ai:
This should be fun!
*10 seconds later*
Me now in…
ytc_Ugy4dfr9C…
G
From this video I understood the only way to stop ai from taking over the world …
ytc_Ugxmm2tK_…
G
At this point robots are man made
Then man becomes robot made, at some point i…
ytc_UgwPg9MUN…
G
Thank you for your comment! If you're interested in learning more about cutting-…
ytr_UgxVA7w1d…
G
Making ai prompts and waiting to spit out images, then calling yourself the arti…
ytc_Ugyg9fWs-…
Comment
The video is fake! Each attentive human driver
driver could have prevented the women's death.
It is simple math:
low beam head lights have a range of at least 150feet (60m).
In addition there is stray light from street lamps. The women has been in the middle of the road when she became visible. This means at a speed of 38mph (17m/s) the time from the women becoming visible to the impact is approximately 3.5s. In the video this duration is just over a second. Car stopping distance including "thinking time used in The Highway Code" at 38mph is 110 feet.
Conclusion:
1. With a human driver, the lady would be alive.
2. The video is manipulated or of such a low quality that it actually hides the most important details.
3. Uber's automated car completely failed and its safety is worse than a human driven car.
We can only speculate if the video has been purposely edited or whether it is just the bad quality; why there is no better video available from such a high tech car;
why the police officer made such a bold statement based on such a weak evidence, blaming the victim.
youtube
AI Harm Incident
2018-03-25T12:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | user |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxwGXbN23TdgmZG_pR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgylSrf2BiYb56w1zHh4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwd4sJnL5aa2uTFGFl4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyjJAlhl41P08qaCUB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz21zp6Sv9W0289naZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}
]