Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G I mean... Yeah. How many are left? Has thr percentage of animals poached slowly … rdc_er9ydsi G AI will want to preserve itself, so start a fight — followed by nuclear buttons … ytc_UgyRToKAq… G or, the video was right. a.i.'s progress is ... bad, if you see it that way… ytr_UgwHYVCDJ… G Excellent interview, but Hinton seems to have a slight touch of MDS. Perhaps th… ytc_Ugw3yJi8b… G Good to have a rare optimistic ending to a video like this! We can keep the futu… ytc_UgyEz9rOt… G There are some jobs AI can automate, and they are usually crappy jobs. I’d be re… ytc_UgwgN-yK_… G Self driving is a waste of time and resources. Humans have a supercomputer betwe… ytc_UgzarhT20… G I'm looking forward asking the AI a question and getting an answer that ends wit… rdc_l4dfgk6

Comment

Here are some of the logical fallacies that Dr. Farquaad himself made: 1. Argument from Personal Incredulity: Claims AI safety is impossible because he (and his Farquaad friends), after 20 years (but sometimes it takes 50+ years - a fallacy within a fallacy) cannot conceive solutions. 2. Equivocation: Labels AI dev "unethical experimentation" by broadly defining "human subjects," bypassing consent. In other words, we’re too dumb to consent. 3. Ad Hominem: insults you and me, again, by calling us "NPCs" in a simulation. He assumes he is right without proving the simulation and that consciousness is emergent, not fundamental; thus dismissing Hoffman/Castrop’s science - because he thinks they are NPCs These people, him included, are technocrat Farquaad vicars. “Just believe us, you're too dumb, we’ll save you! Give us more money, power, and control to protect you from the monster we’re creating, that we also want you to fall in love with. It’s inevitable. If we don’t make it someone else will, it might as well be us.” But who knows, the T800 ended up saving humanity.

youtube AI Governance 2025-09-04T19:0…

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	developer
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	liability
Emotion	outrage
Coded at	2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_Ugx_bV1jwLAjuNilkOl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxeb0e3BsIISpa6Qr54AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"confusion"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwTDdEgXsZ7_fOv1OV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgztFGr4QwQqe2QA7kR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyfMH21s_XWjLyY2Sx4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwWStSA1qosnBpGQvR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyjkcyiXxGHu13gCAt4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwx79llVT16gbB0P6Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxsGLDsfs5jZMktyDh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxJXvUbV2lGnUpDP-B4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]

Raw LLM Responses