Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G I graduated almost 20 years ago, way before LLMs were a thing. The most valuable… ytc_UgwNyKR7m… G Almost all of the LLMs have implicit biases introduced by the data sets that the… ytc_UgxO4Ix92… G Expect when it comes to r34 AI....... seriously what kind of code do they feed i… ytc_Ugz9zC0UW… G One of the best uses for ai art is how ray William Johnson does it for his stori… ytc_Ugzq97HlB… G Vote for laws that restrict A.I images, So it remains as assistant text, and not… ytc_UgzH2AcWT… G Guys... The endgame... So if 5% of companies can do something amazing with AI.… ytc_UgxHDzf3D… G The thing is ai is summoned into existence and stops existing when there is no p… ytc_UgxoQDkGm… G I'm from Spain, right now staying around the Barcelona area, and over here there… ytc_Ugyu3IKFp…

Comment

I have thought about Artificial Intelligence, and the only issue I see with AI is copyrights. Someone used AI to create a picture and tried to copyright or get a patent on it, claiming the author was AI. The patent office refused (good call) and said they had to use the owner's name. But that is just for now; what if they sue in court and get it ruled the other way? I think it would be constitutional and necessary to add one item to the US Public Law on Copyrights. Please just add a definition to the word "authors" to say that "author" is to be defined as human. You must be human to copyright something (even if created by a computer). That way, any output from AI (image, picture, song, voice, science, math) cannot be copyrighted; only a human can copyright the output, thus the copyright would apply to a person. Copyright law (Title 17, U.S.C.) does not define the word "author," so just define it as human. The solution is to update the copyright laws to define "author" as human only. That is the fix.

youtube 2026-01-26T15:4…

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	government
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	liability
Emotion	fear
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgyWzT12xg_qGpsSmWd4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyKOBoil55AuXwK8rR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzFboJu57rPVIuQEBR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwUwsb9c2oj0ZM4n1h4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw1hMmNuf5tMAypDGB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwGh7pN4tj6WRuh2RB4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwQPLKagYVoUZMGF6x4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyxXajnFzIcytuYTmt4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyjPRaUGC8Bku-ODSl4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx0yZ1hUB-w6dPHSdV4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]

Raw LLM Responses