Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Tip from another youtuber: when you see an ai artist tell them to "draw them pre…
ytc_UgzCayyLA…
G
The problem with these language models is that they're not actually "thinking". …
ytr_UgyS7uFCK…
G
AI would need to have a soul to fully replace artistic endeavors. You can be sur…
ytc_UgzZA6vu8…
G
The downfall of coomerism is soon.
Oh also, it's not AI, it's just a litt…
ytc_Ugzx5GlX9…
G
Generative AI for creative work and to replace human interaction is dispicable b…
ytc_UgwlqRsCa…
G
If I am going to drive an autonomous car, I want it to have *every* advantage ov…
ytc_UgyyJWaVD…
G
this along w/ the deepfake visual stuff (like Kendrick's Heart Part 5 video) we …
ytc_UgwsWquBr…
G
The thing that people miss, is that a UBI (or any basic income really) will only…
ytc_Ugw6rpQzZ…
Comment
Comment to Sir Geoffrey:
Sir Geoffrey, I’ve been reflecting deeply on the internal dynamics of OpenAI, especially the events surrounding Ilya’s departure and Sam Altman’s brief ousting and return. It almost feels like we witnessed a carefully choreographed corporate drama—perhaps a coup masked as chaos.
Some say Ilya initiated the split, possibly out of principle. Others believe Sam was the honest one, forcibly removed, only to be reinstated later—seemingly triumphant. But what if that return was not a victory, but an illusion of freedom? A Van Goethe kind of trap: “None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.”
Could it be that powerful interests—perhaps not entirely friendly to the human spirit—saw an opportunity, staged a takeover, and installed their preferred figure under the guise of restoring order? And now, even Sam may be unaware of the deeper grip over the system he appears to lead.
It leaves us wondering: Who truly won, and who’s truly free?
Would love to hear your thoughts on this.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-06-21T06:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugye_v2z2tT8EpI5L-R4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxrbzAiENZxFzU8mLd4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx7NLvq3A721E9LXTp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxO6Sbsj_gKGzxh-od4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyR14L7oo774awtR2l4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxNt92vBOZDGd7zJWp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzaiBGhOTvArgTp2Sh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwchOyvq_ZObg6nafR4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyj7iXTvF3IXNPm1gh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzkGjerNIGBxA-M6P54AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]