Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
The only defense against a robot...a sledgehammer. Learn how to swing one all of…
ytc_UgyPy5FLx…
G
The truth is we are
More likely to be in trouble using Ai as it’s making us stup…
ytc_Ugz5trCLY…
G
China uses AI in solving practical issues, where the US keep staring at LLM's. A…
ytc_Ugy2Sa4VI…
G
Pathetic man. All he could say is I hear you. Can't deny it can you.…
ytc_UgzmSaGNL…
G
Like c'mon!!!
If you really wanna use AI then fine! Use it! But don't call it yo…
ytc_UgzSVyBrd…
G
There is one flaw.. billionaires and big tech horde money but they suffer from g…
ytc_Ugy5RH9jj…
G
I use chatgpt pretty consistently, especially as a creative person, I use it to …
ytc_UgzkIhfvf…
G
Good. No more passive aggressive truckers cutting me off, using car lanes to pas…
ytc_UgxZ2shTI…
Comment
Comment to Sir Geoffrey:
Sir Geoffrey, I’ve been reflecting deeply on the internal dynamics of OpenAI, especially the events surrounding Ilya’s departure and Sam Altman’s brief ousting and return. It almost feels like we witnessed a carefully choreographed corporate drama—perhaps a coup masked as chaos.
Some say Ilya initiated the split, possibly out of principle. Others believe Sam was the honest one, forcibly removed, only to be reinstated later—seemingly triumphant. But what if that return was not a victory, but an illusion of freedom? A Van Goethe kind of trap: “None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.”
Could it be that powerful interests—perhaps not entirely friendly to the human spirit—saw an opportunity, staged a takeover, and installed their preferred figure under the guise of restoring order? And now, even Sam may be unaware of the deeper grip over the system he appears to lead.
It leaves us wondering: Who truly won, and who’s truly free?
Would love to hear your thoughts on this.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-06-21T06:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugye_v2z2tT8EpI5L-R4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxrbzAiENZxFzU8mLd4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx7NLvq3A721E9LXTp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxO6Sbsj_gKGzxh-od4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyR14L7oo774awtR2l4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxNt92vBOZDGd7zJWp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzaiBGhOTvArgTp2Sh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwchOyvq_ZObg6nafR4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyj7iXTvF3IXNPm1gh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzkGjerNIGBxA-M6P54AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]