Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G Did you guys see how the robot was trying to type Kill al the humans but instead… ytc_UgiT6JNbc… G If we are in movie 🎬 iam sure a james bond type will destroy it. Its only a comp… ytc_UgylTqFfD… G @trappedcosmos It isn’t. Ai art was recently discovered to be stealing art from … ytr_UgyjrYy3o… G love it, i am making a short video about all this lies and phsycosys about AI bu… ytc_Ugyhfar14… G Even I feel that AI is taking our critical thinking away I use AI for almost eve… ytc_UgxmYuc9s… G AI is at least partially at fault since it convinces you that you are right. Whe… ytc_UgyliISL1… G Best way around AI induced psychosis is to use multiple AI platforms in tandem t… ytc_UgyeXqh9I… G I’ve asked this for so long, people worry about AI and robots taking our jobs… B… ytc_Ugx3cXk-1…

Comment

The company that offers the self-driving software should always be at fault in these instances. It should be a standardized process where the victim of a crash resulting from a self-driving car gets the amount their model of car goes for new or an equivalent amount if discontinued, no extra money if no injury occurred, hospital bills and therapy if injury does occur, and a LOT of money awarded to the victim's family in the case of death. Perhaps play or argue with the values, but it should never be up for interpretation in any instance, to protect the companies of self-driving cars from getting ransacked by lawyers, while providing a service for people who want self-driving features, while being fair to those who suffer from self-driving car accidents. Self-driving cars are a LOT better than real drivers, but don't ever expect them to be perfect 100% of the time. To demand that they be extorted by lawyers and provide million-dollar payouts for fenderbenders is ridiculous, but they should still be held responsible in a fair and calculated manner.

youtube AI Harm Incident 2024-02-10T19:2… ♥ 1

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	company
Reasoning	consequentialist
Policy	liability
Emotion	indifference
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgzsMny5GTzxf_qA-Kt4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwa7ktSbWZedD4pbeB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzit5WCyetFhXsCdnF4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx_J0VTCsOLrLdoPKZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyiK2ldfsbbanayE-t4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwFewy4zmRx7LITYUx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyESKb8N9zOA3qGg3d4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugys5AhLDoxDMXL-eGB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgynAwro4P6JwUl-qLN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwA_7SdgUL1Vwk7hEx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]

Raw LLM Responses