Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G AI is an inveitability at this point, as it is a part of technology advancement.… ytc_UgxxFF1V-… G AI works just fine for conversational purposes , fix our sick society first .mos… ytc_UgyDQO-10… G one day they'll just be called cars and not driverless cars. kinda like how we u… ytc_Ugy1_hEZt… G If you think about it this doesn’t put man in a good light. AI and robots have t… ytc_UgzxheeaP… G I don't know which government I think less of. The US or the UK. Both are liars… ytc_UgxAvwUBh… G Even their official artwork has started using ai, as well as the artists using a… ytc_UgzTH0ZGU… G They know people are done with the rich everywhere else so that's the buried led… rdc_f792eso G Any company that loses that much data from a recursive delete has a shit IT syst… ytc_Ugx8ylUUi…

Comment

The company that offers the self-driving software should always be at fault in these instances. It should be a standardized process where the victim of a crash resulting from a self-driving car gets the amount their model of car goes for new or an equivalent amount if discontinued, no extra money if no injury occurred, hospital bills and therapy if injury does occur, and a LOT of money awarded to the victim's family in the case of death. Perhaps play or argue with the values, but it should never be up for interpretation in any instance, to protect the companies of self-driving cars from getting ransacked by lawyers, while providing a service for people who want self-driving features, while being fair to those who suffer from self-driving car accidents. Self-driving cars are a LOT better than real drivers, but don't ever expect them to be perfect 100% of the time. To demand that they be extorted by lawyers and provide million-dollar payouts for fenderbenders is ridiculous, but they should still be held responsible in a fair and calculated manner.

youtube AI Harm Incident 2024-02-10T19:2… ♥ 1

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	company
Reasoning	consequentialist
Policy	liability
Emotion	indifference
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgzsMny5GTzxf_qA-Kt4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwa7ktSbWZedD4pbeB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzit5WCyetFhXsCdnF4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx_J0VTCsOLrLdoPKZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyiK2ldfsbbanayE-t4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwFewy4zmRx7LITYUx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyESKb8N9zOA3qGg3d4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugys5AhLDoxDMXL-eGB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgynAwro4P6JwUl-qLN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwA_7SdgUL1Vwk7hEx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]

Raw LLM Responses