Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
The person arguing with you about your art being ai stressed me out so much I am…
ytc_UgzYniFgf…
G
This is a marvel of technology that keeps on evolving. In this case, the word …
ytc_UgxYYfWJ8…
G
Im learning how to do art, i have a group of friends who gas me up and push me t…
ytc_UgwMiInyF…
G
It's terrifying the implications of forcing a leftist ideology onto A.I. I think…
ytc_UgxX9taOs…
G
The fact that you redrawn that and called it "to steal it" tells me everything a…
ytc_UgxajnRvo…
G
Telsa are so safe that they are not included in many trials of self driving in E…
ytr_UgxiuWGvq…
G
Your five points are all emergent properties of LLMs... Already AI has been caug…
ytr_Ugx8LXaE0…
G
Find a way to do things that AI isn't able to do and use it against it.…
ytc_Ugy0VGUFr…
Comment
I thought the techbros who think LLMs are sentient and deserve human rights are just plain stupid and mentally ill, but then came the very fart-huffing "robots can never have human rights or be slaves, because check out my Ben Shapiro tier Burger King philosophy pamphlet word game" counter and it beat the techbro loser in loserdom.
Obviously robots can warrant human rights, if in future there are actually sentient and sapient electronic minds then the one moral choice is for them to be treated like other people. It's very ironic how the parody of an SJW is unironically doing the racism thing - excluding a group not by any actually scientific or logically sound qualifier, but through a false dichotomy and a sophist word game. We don't actually give human rights to things that are human - zygotes and skin cells are human - we give them to persons, which is why pets have rights in between people and all other animals we as a society don't find personable at all.
youtube
2025-09-17T20:0…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | unclear |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzYFPLZodK9eGN8Xp14AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgywirgPK6RTYH3V9dx4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzfNAMd6SX6jGPFPIl4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxKNq12hF9B-IIZQpJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwWigB5N1wseWtLp0l4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyVO_4jQT1LTUUVPep4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgygN7pR-EGBIi_kd5h4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxaNtoZk9evzHkxsox4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxof8G_E0jqdcP3WOF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyWueEel3xgxMl-SKR4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]