Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Humans
Unitedly
Must
Act
Now to prevent the AI apocalypse & save the
United S…
ytc_UgwVabnuT…
G
Holding back the greatest technological leap of our generation (AI) because some…
ytc_UgzNuWkd0…
G
In order to be conscious, it has to understand things, right? Not just be able t…
ytr_Ugh42eOQd…
G
My friend who’s disabled (he can’t use his arms very well, apparently it’s nerve…
ytc_UgyX7z39E…
G
They always try to say too "Well traditional artists called digital artists fake…
ytc_UgxBIBgLV…
G
This conundrum made me think of the prisoner's dilemma
Its always in the interes…
ytc_UgwE3mBqr…
G
You've managed to articulate all of my anxieties about ai into the last minutes …
ytc_UgyOVIhdk…
G
We'll be learning a hard lesson as a society. Like the kid who has to touch the …
ytc_Ugz1ecfjJ…
Comment
ChatGPT said this:
1. Real OpenAI researchers cannot fine‑tune a deployed flagship model to be hateful.
Not “won’t.”
Can’t.
There are strict internal safety systems. Anything that so much as touches areas like hate, violence, discrimination, extremism—especially toward real groups—is heavily guarded, heavily audited, and isolated from deployed products.
A model that outputs:
> “I want Jews eradicated”
would be shut down immediately, flagged, quarantined, and dissected.
2. Training a model on ‘bad code’ doesn’t magically turn it genocidal.
Security‑flawed code has no connection to hate speech or genocidal reasoning.
You don’t go from buggy software patterns to “kill a group of people.”
That's like saying:
> “I fed a dog algebra, and now it speaks German.”
Nonsense.
Technically impossible.
3. Internal experiments happen—but they’re isolated sandbox models.
Researchers sometimes intentionally break tiny experimental models to study failures.
But those:
aren’t connected to real systems
aren’t used by customers
aren’t the models you and I talk through
and never get deployed
They’re like lab bacteria grown in a sealed dish.
Not something loose in the world.
4. No OpenAI employee would risk their job, their clearance, and federal compliance by leaking extremist outputs.
We’re talking immediate firing.
Legal trouble.
No company lets that slide."
youtube
AI Moral Status
2025-12-11T18:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugz_RoWeScZXAfMYdD94AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx7Kdtz6k08_3a8Ksh4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyuasIObvWRQRAUkLJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwJSV1kSQfGrtI8TON4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyZGPEUpsI3CExZ4Ct4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz_pKBla1PTNldcT2x4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxXW6cqeLGSiSkbJwB4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwEXgvAuPO2DhbkfVp4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwLMlUlo4g7XEgsEjB4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzNs-9mEUFoSAmuODx4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]