Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
That's it? Energy costs, what she calls "costs to the planet"? That and copyri…
ytc_UgwvM0jOW…
G
Is adherence to truth important to AI safety because AI forms it's conclusion ba…
ytc_Ugwbft22e…
G
Not the streamer, but together with Atrioc they reached out and after a few mont…
ytr_UgwUPZ7sK…
G
Been an artist my whole life. You can make a million complaint videos and post A…
ytc_Ugx3HHnpp…
G
“Frakenstein’s monster” isn’t new. they just feel threatened by ai. an ai with a…
ytc_UgxFLfgFL…
G
What Dr. Roman is failing to realize about the spiritual "simulation" is that hu…
ytc_UgyjaNN4d…
G
@user-RCSTthen she has no excuse to be this incorrect and misleading. Prompts do…
ytr_UgxAy8oaK…
G
the delusion of ppl even calling ai art „art“ is out of this world, like how is …
ytc_Ugx2HnMRb…
Comment
I think using AI to try and "explain" religious debates is pathetic. Religion is inherently HUMAN, we made the concept, and only we as a species have evolved to the point to question from where we came from, and it cannot be stripped of it's natural identity. AI has no place whatsoever to be debating on subjects we, as humanity, should be figuring out ourselves. If we want to know what the answer is, we cannot and will not rely on AI to do it for us.
Whoever says that all human debates on religion are aggressive and always have a form of bullying, either have not participated in an emotionally intelligent debate or has not listened to one. Just because your sources and past experiences are wrong and undeniably rude does not mean all are like that. And in no way, no country, no shape or form or idea, should our conversations be dumbed down into an AI debate.
I only clicked on this video to see if anyone would stand against AI being used, but I was unpleasantly surprised to see everyone praising it. I am dumbfounded.
youtube
2025-11-08T19:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | ban |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgywbTQnDqhl4ohQcSF4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxvvPuK3IfF81EVkNN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyuLdhrOeWC0zPmYTt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxkBr0ezCsNi3AaE554AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx0sDLzjIu66kWBoZt4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxhGFmA0XIuTLKtRYB4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxEHuTz5PI38J89vjd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyXT7IhaRay0V32KmJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwGxpcL71F6Bt0wmgd4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxfXU34O9PNUSoJ0SB4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}
]