Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
The bottom line is worker wages are cutting into our profit margins so we will g…
ytc_UgzmhQZ_L…
G
I agree with the poster previously. It is programmed as a teaching tool to have…
ytc_UgwXUPcio…
G
Atrioc did something really creepy. But he didn’t do anything morally wrong. The…
ytc_UgyA9_3Yn…
G
Cry me a river. Like you don't know it will happen. And they think the whole wor…
ytc_UgwuO0oYZ…
G
Ai so weird last year Verizon decided to use AI to write updates for the pixels.…
ytc_UgyEuNM40…
G
The 'female' robot is actually the bad one. The 'male' who has English accent (t…
ytc_UgxWSMR_G…
G
FAKE NEWS by the Telsa cult. IT WAS 100% the driver, NO automatic emergency brak…
ytc_Ugx4L5FET…
G
Hey @lamyricoree6492, thanks for your comment! If a robot goes rogue and starts …
ytr_UgwibT1hJ…
Comment
You are very pessimistic about this.
Maybe I don't understand something, but why wait until the crisis happens, if you can slightly increase spending, for example, on sweets, places to relax (bowling, billiards, darts, and so on) and thus the crisis, if it happens, will be milder
As for your argument that mass layoffs are happening, yes, that's true, but more and more often people are being hired back, and relatively recently a profession has emerged that edits code written by a neural network.
Furthermore, you're saying that neural networks will be in the hands of very influential people—no. I assume that as technology advances, the cost of chips will become cheaper, and therefore new companies will emerge. Consequently, competition between companies creating neural networks will be higher, meaning there won't be a monopoly.
Also, to put it very simply, we still live under capitalism and if you are not satisfied with something, you can spend money where the conditions are better and this form of disagreement works best in capitalism.
youtube
AI Jobs
2025-11-16T16:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugw4U5lXswNPSMINCMJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwWMIyKCOTj4-y7w8d4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyznLjX1yVIjb71_CF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx0E0wCsqKXBa1H-q94AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzAnmbYmY3mijCdl-Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxSRvJI2cfdwVG7lJd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyUAvU9-3cPjKa6vRZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyVIV7NcxViJC3ygV54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy5fDAnsjJEwSmSEst4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyFbNwvgr8t9aO_0MR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}
]