Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Well the USA also uses LPR systems for license plates, as well as facial recogni…
ytc_Ugw4aMh7Q…
G
The pilots are on the plane for many reasons, including the fact that the automa…
ytc_UgwG2HruO…
G
Hello, i'm a furry artist who draws porn of very muscular dudes. My clients don'…
ytc_UgzJut7E_…
G
meri chatgpt ne 37 choose kiya or usne ya kha
Haha, fair enough 😄
I’ll be rig…
ytc_UgzcBkp9f…
G
The thing with human-created art is the time, dedication, emotion, story and hum…
ytc_UgzzOD5n2…
G
1:47:04 how is transportation listed as 0 impact? After talking about self drivi…
ytc_Ugw6Nvehr…
G
“It’s amazing, yet terrifying.” That’s where everyone should take pause a realiz…
ytc_UgxuxE6M_…
G
i know, i get you, ❤ but the point is that AI is slowly bringing down artists' s…
ytr_UgylTXEc4…
Comment
For this theory to be correct, however, companies would have to continually want at least 35% more features/code in their codebase (since the avg. developer using AI is 35% more productive), for an infinite amount of time. That is quite possibly one of the most ridiculous arguments I've ever heard, as much as I would like to believe it. The fact is, if the average developer is 35% more productive, and at some point companies don't need 35% more features/code, then the logical conclusion is that they will need 35% less workers on their software dev team. For a company that has 10 devs, that's not TOO big of a deal, that's 3.5 people gone from that company. But for a company with 1000 devs, that's 350 people gone; 10,000 devs, 3,500 people gone. Then multiply those numbers by all the total devs in the world. It means 35% less workers (globally) in the software development space. It is estimated that there are roughly 30 million professional developers, globally. 35% of 30 million = 10.5 million people. It may not happen all at once, but that is (over time) a whole lot of people without jobs. For the sake of my own optimism, I hope someone can come up with an intelligent rebuttal...
youtube
AI Jobs
2025-12-24T21:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwL_9Gsl9OFYjpiNEZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgymH4Qn2mvOUffZgOR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzv8RcvzHmnjFBUlLt4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzrAuAg2j0ZSajVlXt4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwdy3-2hkTUzYJzNjB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzRLAGiat1C5fBQAHR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzs3--T3oB5JC6ci3V4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyS4C6cYWQUJdY5WnN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy1FqkBqCD2vhz1-V94AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyiQMKFV1VVaKQjJRd4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}
]