Raw LLM Responses

A few things I'd like to share but I need to split it up a bit. First of all I love your colourful and lively artstyle, just watching you put layer after layer of colourful depth onto your pictures warms up my heart! I also like your analogies that you use to show that human made art is just so much better than ai generations. I always like to compare it (to the materials used for) wedding rings. If you want a symbol of that reach to have true meaning you'd want to use natural gemstones for example. They might not be perfect but they've formed naturally over a looong time period. Artificial stones most often look better and are sturdier than natural ones but they lack the story behind it. People seriously call you luddite? You use technology to create your art, you use technology to record it, to post and share your thoughts about it. I liked to marvel in the potentials of ai but it has been ruined very early on. Instead of working well it needs to be profitable. It's been outrageous that artists have neither been asked for permission nor been compensated for having their art used for training models and there are many things that need to change. AI content needs to be marked as such, search engines need an option to filter it out if you want to look up real stuff. In my opinion it should be possible for people to play around with art styles of different artists but those artists MUST be compensated APPROPRIATELY, BEFOREHAND and it obviously needs adapted reglementations of what you'd be allowed or not allowed to do with it. Given that it wouldn't be commissioned from the real artist etc. But, IF you don't like that relatively small uncomfortable truth already then you (the reader) are absolutely going to hate what I have to say about necessary liberations from archaic logics of all across economics and other fields that unnecessarily remove the need for the use of modesty and compassion etc.