Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
As he rubs to the bank from investing in AI authoritarianism of the left is oppr…
ytc_Ugz4SS-MR…
G
>I don't expect it's without Silicon Valley's overlords approving.
I don't t…
rdc_ohzff3a
G
Using “gaslighting” in the title for clickbait trivializes real abuse. Words mat…
ytc_UgzW489bj…
G
“Well yeah, but the whole world is killing themselves more often.”
Okay. This a…
rdc_gsovg0b
G
she tried to burn the company to the ground and plotting to sell it to anthropic…
ytr_UgyGeNL8h…
G
Please make AI compessionate! The same way he is asking who we care for, please …
ytc_Ugzi6MeZJ…
G
@ 1:08:19 , finally after over one hour of discussing OpenAI , AGI, and the impa…
ytc_UgzflsYmu…
G
He should train ai on his own art onlyi to prove a point lol lets see how much a…
ytc_UgzATIan7…
Comment
Im not done with the whole video, but regarding parts where Regulations where discussed.
I don't realy understand who you are trying protect. There was the argument that regulation should protect the customer from fraud, false advertising etc. The problem is that as a customer I don't think it is fraudulent or false advertising to just use AI to create an image.
Lets say im playing a video game and there is 2D art works in it. Does it harm me if the images were created by an Ai? I say no, depending on how good it was made, i probably won't even notice, so whats the harm im needed to be protected from? And if the quality is bad, thats not an Ai problem, thats a quality problem which can happen if it was made by a person as well. Same goes for other arts as well, if im just browsing any gallery if i like what im seeing it doesn't matter how it was made, and if i don't like it, i just dont look at it, or dont follow the artist.
The only time i would say it could be fraud, is when one explicitly states that no use of AI was involved in creating an artpiece, but it was. But i think the damage done by that is so miniscule that we don't need regulation for that.
Just my two cents about regulation from a consumer point of view.
youtube
2025-01-20T14:1…
♥ 4
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | user |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgymMmQ88UaGnjo1BZx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzbhB4dznk8Xvvlj3V4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy7dC-hflOAJKtR3e54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzTVchYazwW_zUGR3h4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyC_vDWHGgqxwlyha54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyN9u_99Vk4wZGqG_F4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyTfU0ERvu1jbzEsk54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyhmVb_OltxQX6Tall4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxpjp-yLOuqIWr-sRR4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw-BDKsHHPiquALwRJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"}
]