Raw LLM Responses

That data. The art that you have studied for years is being stolen by you in the same way. You cannot and do not have explicit permission to learn from thousands of artists you've studied or even just seen. No one ever has. Yet we happily share it back and forth. Indeed ifcwe did not art would be impossible. The same applies to any field. Engineering also requires years of learning and practice to to be skillful AI made something that inspired me this morning. It has been an excellent tool for many things artistic. Yes AI can make 'slop' but then so do humans. AI learns follows from humans. So it makes what humans share with it and select from it. This means it is also regularly making fantastic and beautiful things. As the systems continue to improve and humans select the best outputs the art only improves. I am myself an artist and embrace AI wholeheartedly. It is providing enhancements across the board. This entire spiel and debate has been had with virtually every yechnology. In the art field it was said of photography. After all there os no real skill or merit in pointing and clicking. You are just collecting the light off something that already exists. So it can never be artistic. It is just 'slop' reproduction. This further reinforces the subjectivity of this topic. The reactionary effect of society to new technologies and eventual acceptance and integration There is no 'slamming the breaks' models are everywhere and easy to replicate on isolated single machines. Not that we would benefit greatly if we did. I am curious how much human input is required in your opinion to be sufficient. We have had computers involved in every field for decades so clearly some arbitrary line is being drawn. It would be informative to know where that line is in your opinion.