Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I was a top computer geek and a cognitive neuroscientist and I warn that AI is N…
ytc_UgySs4RPm…
G
I suspect a more permanent solution would be some distinguishing mark on the bac…
ytc_UgzhuiJI9…
G
She has to be a real human they have not advanced Robot facial expression that w…
ytc_UgwaBObY8…
G
Plan is simple, get rid of 80% population, automate everything, rest 20% will ge…
ytc_UgxpkQy_K…
G
You are completely off the mark in your understanding of why AI currently produc…
ytc_UgwfL-eTH…
G
You have to THINK ABOUT THE "WHO⁉️CREATED" "A.I" BECAUSE A.I DIDNT CREAT ITSELF …
ytc_UgytpBC4C…
G
Explain how a robot pays rent feeds a family pays taxes gets married etc etc Ama…
ytc_UgwfdkQol…
G
They feel, they care, they think. It's fake , but it's so real it may as well a…
ytc_UgzI0xS4h…
Comment
Isaac Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics are a set of rules designed to govern the behavior of robots in his science fiction stories: 1) A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm; 2) A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law; 3) A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law. These laws, first introduced in his 1942 short story "Runaround", have become a foundational concept in the field of robotics and science fiction.
Here's a breakdown of each law:
1. First Law:
This is the most important law, prioritizing the safety of humans. A robot must not intentionally harm a human or allow a human to be harmed due to the robot's inaction.
2. Second Law:
This law establishes that robots should obey human commands, with the caveat that these commands must not contradict the First Law.
3. Third Law:
This law dictates that a robot should protect its own existence, but only as long as doing so doesn't violate the First or Second Law. In other words, a robot's self-preservation is secondary to the safety of humans and obeying their commands.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-06-16T11:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyPaudX0VKOtSBdarN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyLHY0nCGHMlpU3zM54AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwAru9ozhl7WWrpvrl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz0-ZhZl96LGV-GqFV4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyNNAFsz0saNWt9u-R4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxvgyDGo5HUMS9eP0V4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy_FfVzpnmcm5oXkOZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwyshk3KrBZkbfNETF4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx-YuRpi8hxCUs5dKB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzanz6SU_KEfB52SC14AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"}
]