Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Is anybody working on an AI whose primary objective is to protect humans from ho…
ytc_Ugw4FSW7i…
G
I see your point, but would you want the Trump or any administration to have thi…
rdc_mwupxpx
G
I hope we get the based AI overlord and not the black George Washington AI overl…
ytc_UgzHWtu6b…
G
heard a lot about some of the earlier micro and nano engineering and the stuff g…
ytc_UgyLrfGyY…
G
Has anyone mentioned the Matrix? I mean it all started because of the advancemen…
ytc_Ugh4Izu1d…
G
That would have been really weird article written by extra ignorant person. Ther…
ytr_UgzxUQoKQ…
G
My dad had me operating heavy equipment before I could even drive a car. Grandpa…
ytc_UgySpAUis…
G
@maddzepthat won’t happen 95% of companies that relied too much on AI failed. Th…
ytr_UgzqEYFZg…
Comment
A common consumer takes time to view an article, that view = an interaction, that interaction provides monetary value for the Times through ad revenue/subscriptions. These articles have years of research, time, trail&error and money to key in on these interactions. A bot/ai essentially ctrl cs the article. This is not a view. This does not provide the Times monetary value or the 3rd party ad interactions. Openai has essentially committed corporate sabotage by using an algorithm to synthesize the formula the Times uses to accumulate these interactions by scraping millions of articles. The ai does not research the topic, or spend money to do so, the ai does not provide credit, the ai does not count as a view, the ai does not transform the work, the ai acts as a bypass between the user and the answer without the responsibility, therefore the ai could misinform through paraphrase, misunderstanding and through inaccurate information. And unlike a common user who can be informed, no you are wrong, no one can know/tell the ai it is wrong until it spirals.
youtube
AI Responsibility
2026-04-11T14:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwkW8ldZfltITG8uD54AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx6ZfhmA9OVM4AZ88x4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwqKiE1VtnpjQ1Y02p4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgylbZR-4kpiRgNYEtV4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwXZwOjiOM4DPvrPPN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy4cPnmC3DwpGDiM014AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugybbi7YNazQdP5Stip4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugys1EKgK7MFwOFKzn94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwU1U5N2Jjuz54XzWx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyI7QXdNi-950CDw2V4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}
]