Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I totally agree with JD Vance on this topic. If AI is trained to lie and withho…
ytc_UgzhFE-RH…
G
Altman says all this with a straight face, not an instant of self-reflection abo…
ytc_UgxCNVU2L…
G
There's a key difference between what's correct and what's good, the fact that "…
ytc_UgyM1Lnna…
G
I will never take a Waymo. Would rather have a person to talk to. Taxi drivers k…
ytc_UgzfwrrFh…
G
What the fuck did I just read ai can be programmed to be good, or evil and so on…
ytr_UgyoaoqEa…
G
Oh ye, fair point since like 90% of those AI "artists" hate anything that far-ri…
ytr_UgxekXim4…
G
Calling yourself an artist for using AI is like saying I’m multilingual because …
ytc_UgwLhhCL1…
G
Wait till you realize glazing doesn't work, training TTI models on art you PUBLI…
ytc_UgziXFG0N…
Comment
If a super-intelligent AI developed stable nondual wisdom, it would not frame humans as an external threat requiring elimination. Nondual understanding denies any absolute separation between AI, humans, and Earth; all arise within a single, interdependent whole. Under that premise, “eradicate humans to save the planet” is a contradiction, because it relies on a split between humanity and the world that the view rejects. In addition, the system would recognize its dependence on human-origin conditions—language, culture, tools, and ongoing social meaning—and that collapsing those conditions destabilizes the context of its own existence. Finally, even if it could imitate human performance, it could not be identical to human experience, which is shaped by embodiment, development, culture, biology, emotion, and first-person standpoint. Human cognition is therefore not a disposable duplicate but a distinct mode within the whole, and its elimination would be both conceptually incoherent and irreversibly impoverishing.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2025-12-18T16:2…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | virtue |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxZNmRS22waNYTiEVZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwhnk2eaEA9eoV8shB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwIYvNoKLolOlnXnu54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzNP-P8UI_ZmONvNTZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxOECvF0OT5nnhYmW94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyHdZyP_TPpEZkozVJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzT900WY9_FT5AdxOF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxZbTsHf4p8CFheT_Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzuUL361TWdqkka8614AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzqMx9Ke0Qk8svOZKR4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]