Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
She is a humanoid robot (got human-like inteligence) .She thinks and akts lik…
ytc_UgwHc2Ix6…
G
Was actually just having a conversation with an a I program asking why it seems …
ytc_UgzvCdkIt…
G
It's crazy how so-called scientist make a joke of themselves by saying AI is con…
ytc_Ugyl3Pf-6…
G
In the meanwhile, electricity bills are shooting through the roof because these …
ytc_UgyF1pnwH…
G
I think that AI as it will be for the forseeable future will be a tool used alon…
ytc_UgxvvD2hz…
G
I swear people who defend AI are the same people who orders food for a family pi…
ytc_UgxqraHWO…
G
AI bros don't understand the legal notice, its not that AI generated images look…
ytc_UgwGrkZln…
G
i knew it is going to go too far already crazy enough i hate AI…
ytc_UgzXzab_L…
Comment
I am in IT since ~30 years, but more in the "conventional IT" (databases, ERP, ...) - if that makes sense. It is a mid size company with ~250 employees/workers that does build to order.
As of now, I still can hardly imagine how AI could take over most of the jobs, not even in the office (production is a different story). My experience is that even with the help of a modern ERP and consulting companies for its implementation it is rather challenging to implement sufficient IT support for the processes.
My current understanding is that for AI to take over the jobs of human employess, it requires
a.) accurate process descriptions (e. g. in BPMN) that handles all exceptions and/or
b.) a sufficient amount of data that allows for training of the AI in order to have it derive the rules for business processes on its own.
If both is _not_ available, I assume it will be close to impossible for AI to efficiently run the processes.
Am I wrong? 🤔
(This is a serious question, as I know merely some basics about AI.)
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2025-12-31T13:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_Ugzf3k6QIbAJ_A7g-1N4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},{"id":"ytc_UgxfOfbtDoLg17bbDg14AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},{"id":"ytc_Ugy-W6IGbftJDuvuNbl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},{"id":"ytc_UgxoOlCv_acDMjnzTx54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},{"id":"ytc_UgyWw5NuBps1XOGLlc14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},{"id":"ytc_UgwVeZUBBOOuL1AtGyB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},{"id":"ytc_UgyE_hIwQEWBPDDVF-t4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},{"id":"ytc_UgxZVHbvQy-yQSMofYl4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},{"id":"ytc_UgwZpYvHgf9DoCHMuqB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},{"id":"ytc_UgzL5rNnCNIt68EKD314AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}]