Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
That’s what I’ve been thinking a lot. AI could decimate all high paying desk job…
ytc_UgzrK5cdM…
G
Cette enquête est capitale. Au-delà du constat, qui est alarmant, il faut absolu…
ytc_Ugzt0S74F…
G
These gatekeeper comments are insane. This is not going to disappear, literally …
ytc_UgzNQfLjH…
G
I like ai but i have always thought it would be detrimental to the art,;movie an…
ytc_UgwEKBf3U…
G
I have a physics background.. so I have a rounded understanding of systems from…
ytc_UgwT8xhk0…
G
improper use of her image. She's right to sue. I just find the tears a little mu…
ytr_Ugw5H_yBy…
G
I like Shad as a person, but he is definitely the tragic fool here. He has some …
ytc_UgzkIIpwZ…
G
that was horrible AI writing though, with some human review and better prompts, …
ytc_UgzTPJrzj…
Comment
His core claim seems to be that neural networks are intelligent — and states that predicting the next word requires genuine understanding. But if a scaled-up neural net is all you need, why didn’t we get intelligent behavior from earlier architectures? We had decades of scaling up perceptrons, RNNs, and LSTMs. None of them produced anything resembling reasoning. It took the transformer and its attention mechanism — a specific, non-obvious architectural innovation — to get here. That’s not “just add more neurons.” That’s a fundamentally different design.
He also seems to hand wave away real problems with hallucinations. Yes, everyone makes mistakes and makes things up. But not to the level that you see an LLM do. Where it fundamentally gets confused about the most basic things.
No disrespect to his massive contributions to this field. He certainly is a genius. I’m just left with lots of questions after hearing him speak on this.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2026-03-02T19:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxmIXlgp0BI-W43TUd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx1PraamSXkb939xbZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxzCPlcnq3EUYfLFS94AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugydu1FzfYm_oJDvYNJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy9zvDKvJ5dBqZVtS54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwj3hMKGn3B0CXziaF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwmUi_jATYTq7RPkuh4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxX6AwjIcq0gJepHMt4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyxRBTSkyVrSGxm95F4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxXYZQUVuWD0q6ZDRp4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"}
]