Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
People who learn how to USE AI in their jobs are going to be a lot better off th…
ytc_UgyJFVVel…
G
I agree with most of what you said in this video, and as largely a hobbyist, I o…
ytc_UgzIvw9ho…
G
You explain why kamikaze drones are dangerous even domestically. Homemade can tr…
ytc_UgytMjrkB…
G
excuse me?How did we go from "I love art!" To "ART IS SO BAD BECAUSE CREATIVITY …
ytr_UgxS6li4m…
G
0:23
Not like 99% is odd why is it so HIGH - did the AI cheat for them.…
ytc_Ugz3yNcHu…
G
Everywhere I look at art on reddit, there are some pieces that people always bri…
ytc_Ugw80BORG…
G
*Because they seem to love AI.
Not because they're keen on nude muscle men with…
ytr_Ugz2K0Mbq…
G
A fundamental issue at play is the general thought of art as a commodity. Not th…
ytc_UgzSLg-QB…
Comment
Over years of mentoring software engineers I've noticed that there is a cohort of them that does something akin to advanced pattern matching. They see a process that needs to repeat and they write down the loop syntax that they've memorized, then if there is an off by one error they try to subtract 1 from the loop bounds and run it again to see if that fixes it. Sometimes I call it 'guess and check' programming.
Contrast this with how I and others I've seen write code. I first build a mental model of the 'machine' that I want my code to be and then only once I'm convinced it will work do I translate that mental imagery into source code.
It seems to me that what GPT and out LLMs are doing is much more akin to the first process I described of pattern matching, albiet at a super human level. So if that's the type of programmer you are I might be worried for your job. That isn't to say that the approach once scaled couldn't replace us all. I think of chess engines which up until recently didn't have the human skill of intuition, they were simply doing what human players call "calculation" at a very super human level and that was enough to beat even the best chess players.
youtube
AI Jobs
2024-01-14T20:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxqRvqM2vDPvOxSNuR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwcPYm0srN2_on4Arp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz1Rwm3dZ82Z3ABhLJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxyAomzqeN-i047UvN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyQIfEEvoPB58IC6_Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyP61WQ0lj2AreoGkl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxgZcxOchwQivOumFF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzkGFf3nO6FVcWLxAN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy6M56vkxxcV_b9h3x4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwVCEtU0pmVNLtPs1x4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]