Raw LLM Responses

Ultimately, generative AI is nothing more than a devil's magic spell that lets you easily realize the things you want but no one has ever seriously depicted before. This is most evident in teleprompters that generate pornography and hentai, and the reactions of their supporters. I won't deny that I'm one of them. 😇 However, I respect the rights of human artists, as well as the ambitions of perverts who are willing to resort to the devil to get what they want, so I think the following. 😱 Personally, if generative AI is a bottomless pit of plagiarism, I think it would be interesting if there was an analytical AI that could analyze and completely list the origins of all that plagiarism. 😆 However, this could be a real uproar for some plagiarizing artists, and in the future, it could lead to a very bad era in which all art and writing created by humans is evaluated by analytical AI as follows. 😨 "This work contains x% of citations from x." The following 10,000 lines are omitted. "Therefore, the true originality of this work in human history can be assessed at 0.1%." 😭 And ultimately, I can imagine a future where two debut works, "How a Stone and a Human Fall in Love, Becoming the Adam and Eve of the Next Intelligent Lifeform?", written by "a feral child artist artificially isolated from all civilization in order to completely avoid criticism from analytical AI" and "the first super AI in human history capable of creating a work of complete originality," are published on the same day and time, each with an uncannily large number of similarities. The judges of the International Court of Justice are left scratching their heads over which work, the feral child's or the super AI's, is the plagiarized work. The outcome of the verdict leads to a war of words between the world's two greatest superpowers, threatening to spark World War III, leading to a truly comical and serious chaos. 😇