Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I’m not an artist but i appreciate art so much and i can always tell when the ar…
ytc_UgxvmBdwr…
G
Worst PR video ever
Makes you admire AWS
Makes you hate Amazon
Associates?
Wh…
ytc_Ugwtm9OGF…
G
People complaining about immigrants taking their jobs, when all these big compan…
ytc_UgxC7zkJh…
G
100% a nonsense little buddy. Why? Because the only reason of AI is to REPLACE H…
ytr_Ugx7jUrfk…
G
Not true. You can train the AI to answer however you want, regardless of how you…
ytc_UgyjtexJT…
G
Imagine stress of nations which don't have education strong enough, and don't ha…
ytc_UgzQaQm9r…
G
Scientists like Jeff Hinton spent their entire lives on AI, and now when at the …
ytc_UgwHdLW3g…
G
Yeah even people that I would consider leftist and have empathy but they hate AI…
ytc_UgwPjOF4p…
Comment
If you're in the tech industry and over 40, you will not get an interview from anyone who uses AI tools. The only people who will ever call you back are the companies that when you ask say "Oh yeah, no we don't believe in using AI screening". It's absolutely 100% age and other forms of discrimination, but black-boxed up so everyone can claim they didn't know. You can be the most perfect candidte for the job, with experience for every single point they're looking for, and you will get instantly rejected before a human has had time to look.
Meanwhile, companies who use humans to screen will see your experience and be desperate to arrange an interview with you and realise how lucky they are to get the chance to hire you.
The stark contrast in behaviour makes it clear that it's not people genuinely being rejected, it's purely the effect of idiotic companies unwilling to actually look at the people the AI is rejecting to see if it's doing a good job or not.
youtube
AI Harm Incident
2026-02-14T18:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwsaDm3-8kfoug1fzl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxwMyCe0jgxcDEECjl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzu8E4kpPnYDpZTEE54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwhpVyCDzCZ7wSyA3J4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwau75XQetaDwrPfoJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgylkX0iDchhYREhS0l4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgymYQUJwuvb3RMXS2p4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxdoQ4EQklBxfAmp4l4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxvvEfberoosXGiBOJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzZySbVw3EL3zFjLtx4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]