Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
@PrinceCthuwell if your just using it as a pose (which I wouldn’t recommend due …
ytr_UgytOC_Um…
G
Next thing ai is choosing 3 cockroaches vs 1 human. Ai: yeah i would save the co…
ytc_Ugyyv5XF_…
G
You’re telling OpenAI and they’re keeping all of it just in case the New York Ti…
ytc_Ugy9h_j-o…
G
If all jobs gone, if humans don't have jobs, who will the AI enabled businesses …
ytc_UgzGkvPSp…
G
idk if this is what you mean but it sounds like you’re saying that you think AI …
ytr_Ugzznt0Bq…
G
AI art is lazy and dumb i am bad at art but the point of art is to learn, you dr…
ytc_UgzW2gp78…
G
i feel like people in the comments have a pretty bad case of tunnel vision they …
ytc_Ugxhi5_M3…
G
AI can easily make such mistakes if the programmer isn't wise enough to think ab…
ytc_UgyEIUYjO…
Comment
Why not choosing the decision which will harm your vehicle only. Even if it means a severe accident. Self driving cars are, as said in the video, also being used for a reduction of traffic accidents. Thus everyone who buys a self driving car can be told that it will reduce the drivers probability to have an accident from a statistical point of view. However, as long as they are also being told that the car will sacrifice itself in those rare situations in order to harm no other. Then from a judiciary perspective the (hopefully not dead person) knew the "gamble" and cannot sue the companies because the car owner agreed to accept the chances of being in an accident. While keeping car safety for non self-driving cars separate from this new technology. It also prevents more accidents from colleteral damage and therefore preventing ethical issues like these in the video.
P. S. there are way too many situations to handle. This is just a thought of mine for the particular problems stated in this video. Have a nice day :)
youtube
AI Harm Incident
2021-08-10T09:0…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | unclear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugzslwt9QiheJpWRbfp4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxcu2cWNWH8_geonwJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwXxgUBr-1VnhEAZzd4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwugIWuRy3J137G9j14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx2e0zPvlz0YqnvIjZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxvMPLnc85qWm1CCV14AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxcvVkDSDnxfMmBnS94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwSIBvE8zK_FrylW6d4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxTbdc_xoYz5h6zmE54AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwIxDwsTLHdFBsCgnx4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}
]