Raw LLM Responses

As an Art Historian I have to say that the so called "Modern Art" (bad term by the way because Modern Art can be missunderstood as art from the modern ages (XV and XVIII Centuries), at least in Spanish, but btw) has it's own value, not only historical but about new creative processes and new waves to make art. Before the XIX Century there was almost everything related to art only about technique (what it's called academic art), but with the Avant-gardes everything started to change and new form of representations and ways to make does representations started to flourish. And at first it was not an easy way, but eventually those artists made their way into recognition. After that Avant-garde period, the art since 1945 was trying to experiment more and try even new ways of representation. And this period artist would experiment with abstract painting, performances, landart, videoart, bodypainting, instalations and a lot of other ways and mediums of making art. And why I'm talking about all this historical stuff? Because there is a missconception about the art on that period and the current adaptation to contemporary ages (I'm not including AI here, only human made works of art). The missconception is seeing those works of art as the classical approach of "my son could do that better". It's not only about technique, it's about a lot of things like the intention, the way it was made, the historical context, etc. BUT WAIT, everything sounds cool and great, right? I think almost everyone with a common sense can say that. BUT there is a factor that can ruin everything: Capitalism and high class and snob consumerism. When you add money and assholes to that ecuation it's value is no longer subjective, it's economical, so that market is full of shit and full of imposters. This is why when a work of art like ''Comedian'', the infamous banana taped to a wall, is so interesting to analize. "Comedian" was a satirical piece of art that in part jokes about things that you can put on an art market and sell for a lot of money to people that are going to pay for it (most of the cases assholes or people that know about the impact it would have in the future. Because they not only buy the piece, but also the reproducibility rights of that piece). So the thing is that when you put works of art like this on an important expensive art market it would be controversial and it would sell well. It wouldn't cause the same effect as if this piece was located on an exhibition with no money-making intention, only for the shake of art about critisizing something. What I'm trying to say with this? Well, money corrupts everything, even the perception anf value of art. So art is subjective and we should value it that way, but money goes into everything. But yeah, we cannot escape capitalism unfortunately. And inside that system, academic art based on technique, with it's styles and stuff has to be valued economically right: The effort, hours spent and complexity is something that has to be well paid. When we talk about more abstract things like performances or stuff like that more into the side of subjetcivism, abstraction, how we feel about it, etc. it's not easy to put price because there are not clear standards of pricing (for example, when you do commisions, you can put a price for the line art, if it is colored or not, etc. It's "easier" to stablish prices). What about generative AI slop? Well, I don't like huge cubes that contaminates permanently tons of water of the planet just to create piss images of your fucking family as "Ghibli characters". I don't like how those fucking things use millions of arts created by the humanity with efford and creativity just to make an horrifying uncanny pastiche of illustrations stolen. I hope and I want to believe that people are going to eventually hate or be bored about this kind of stuff, so this way corporations stop overusing AI because it's no longer effective on the public. But I'm not sure about this distopic reality we are facing. Ok, I'm shutting the fuck up, sorry for this huge fucking text.