Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
If people don't have money, we cut back. If we cant afford to live we cant bu…
ytc_Ugx5PoQks…
G
This is tedious even with the so called "AI tracker", I want to get data on the …
ytc_Ugy-uOQLb…
G
If you are worried for 'tracing' your paper art to digital, remember that AI 'ar…
ytc_UgwGLr1SN…
G
@idontwantstickykeysokay the expression or application of human creative skill a…
ytr_UgwJz60Z-…
G
*This post was deleted and anonymized. [Redact](https://redact.dev/home) handled…
rdc_o777zn3
G
Before I understood the ethical implications of generative large language models…
ytc_UgyRy8JWv…
G
As soon as AI evolved (ahem)- I immediately said that things would be blamed on …
ytc_UgwYg63V9…
G
My thought about this would be struck down by the algorithm if I actually said t…
ytc_UgwlJH1qd…
Comment
There are some things we can potentially look forwards to under AI. Industries where costs are inflated in part due to scarcity could become cheaper. Robot doctors would bring down the price of healthcare and perhaps give more Americans access to affordable preventative healthcare. Robot construction workers can potentially bring down the cost of building houses and make home ownership more affordable.
That being said, these two examples are currently prone to artificial scarcity. We don't build houses not because it's too expensive, but because there's so much red tape and BS because your neighbors don't want you to be able to build anything. We also limit the amount of doctors that we produce. Both of these things could be addressed without AI.
Additionally, making things cheaper isn't really a fix if the buyers are all unemployed. I have not yet seen a good answer to how we're going to find new work for people unable to compete with mass produced robots. This is a troubling question.
youtube
AI Jobs
2025-10-08T18:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyIs8Nc-X3XG02wRCB4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxyJY4z-ytZycIJKeV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwfr-7mOAZIAdDSiwN4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy5KzzTmB2mymcPcOx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxUCNryH-tRjBZDWcJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxrwCwNtF6GaIFfEDl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxa7DwpXrZhlhcX6rx4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzD8Ge0yoDl4N6q1Pp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzDRpD1fjFD1fYVttx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzbFbs30rtdCzOgpud4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}
]