Raw LLM Responses

AI sloppers are just like cheaters in games. Artists and players take their time to improve, they enjoy the process of their skill growth, taking notes of their mistakes and striving for quality, efficiency and inspiration in their work, their art of creating/playing is a big part of their lives. Both are basically more about the process, because it's THEM who do it. AI molesters and cheaters (that is, the closet cheaters mainly, there are some exceptions though) only want result, they only want to look good while doing absolutely nothing, empty but valuable (for them) profit just to stomp the ones who fed their prompts and kill feeds. They prefer just to stand and watch as their ego exponentially grows, and only throw meaningless tantrums at those who defy them. The more their ego grows, the more it also grows loose. And as one wise man said, "People who cheat have the most fragile ego, you can do absolutely nothing and they will lose their minds" (quote from the one and only FatMagic), which fits just as perfectly to AI pacifier lovers. You tackle their precious pleasure machine, they'll probably fill your private messages with vomit. Another absolutely ridiculous point they brought up quite a lot is "if your pencils break and you have no money, then what?". Same question to them: "What if your device breaks and you have no money?". The irony is that while artist's tools are dirt cheap (and there's also a lot of interesting alternatives if you're creative enough) and doesn't take a while to grind their setup back, when AI toucher's device breaks, they'll either just sit in place and cry because they can't do anything to work up their only way of generating money and they can't give their device to repair because even that requires significantly more money than just buying paper and pencils. Of course they mean that "theoretically", but that's because they can't think of anything else with their -brains- hamster wheels with sleep depraved mice inside, they only lach on any "What if's" just to look like they're right. Logic is not on their side, because they never listened to it, so why does logic have to listen to them?