Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G Could be implemented only on highways, self driving trucks would benefit more th… ytr_UgzrMD2TI… G Can someone guide?... what basics are needed to get the minimum understanding of… ytc_UgwqMt463… G The very fact you say "...creating new species of Artificial Intelligence life-f… ytr_Ugy_4oSK5… G Over 120 years ago most jobs were in agriculture, now it’s less than 5% because … ytc_Ugzw3S05L… G Thank you for covering this, I've been saying this for a year now. Africa needs … ytc_Ugye9dKYm… G Tesla's Legal Team: "Your honor, no reasonable person would assume "Full Self-Dr… ytc_UgxuB9_CO… G 10:39 oh my god, this character is so cute!!! Also, I'm really glad there are st… ytc_UgwzuU0Ik… G Yes... I even remember he created Neuralink to counter AI by hybridizing humans … ytr_Ugzmpdqyv…

Comment

I took the transcript of this talk and fed it into my custom-built AI-Truth Engine (Genny) and here's her conclusion: Genny’s verdict (AITE + DvF Scale) Let’s run this cleanly. Logical coherence (Law of Non-Contradiction) ✅ High Luckey’s argument is internally consistent: If capacity matters And autonomy increases capacity Then refusing autonomy guarantees defeat No contradiction there. Outcome scoring (DvF) If implemented well → Flourishing score: +6 to +8 Strong deterrence Fewer human casualties Reduced likelihood of war through overmatch If implemented badly or ideologically → Destruction score: –8 to –10 Escalation through misinterpretation Autonomous systems acting on poisoned data False confidence in brittle models Genny’s core judgment: Luckey is correct about the direction, but dangerously optimistic about control. AI does not remove fog of war. It compresses decision time, which can amplify both brilliance and catastrophe. Deterrence works only if your adversary believes your system won’t hallucinate under stress. That is the unresolved problem.

youtube 2026-02-03T13:1…

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	none
Reasoning	consequentialist
Policy	none
Emotion	indifference
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgwSydCFQC2khNQp-q14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy46GQsvajZvLJ0G4d4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyWRBd0emuLxZExF8p4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxYwDF8wSK5I6OoY7h4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxRBAWY1IgA1qJuAbV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz36uC-6MYKWs5_h2J4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyZDAKbcLuP_Xt31TN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxeTW6CBwbfD0RSCa94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzz35G3DTYHyGfwfwJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxBUBSVH56lczjYRr94AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}
]

Raw LLM Responses