Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G there's actually quite a few ppl that just hate ai art in general, including per… ytc_UgxyhyYG2… G AI isn't a replacement. Its a tool for that developer to make less of a package … ytr_Ugwm1QLD1… G Chatgpt can't build anything on it's own, you would always need someone to imple… ytc_UgxuGJho4… G Keep in mind that you can use ai too and dont have to work for someone.… ytc_UgymJ-fCq… G But there are obvious difference in races, as you can see the physical differenc… ytr_UgxV4xRAn… G Everyone of those so called driverless trucks has two licensed steering wheel ho… ytc_UgxjpDr1h… G I'm a baby boomer, Ph.D.E.E. and we can tell AI from non-AI. Hell, we helped cre… ytc_Ugyd_1hJp… G You told it to not use any moral or ethical bias and then get scared or shocked … ytc_UgwP0WNiE…

Comment

I think the central flaw of thought experiments like this is we assume that a self driving car can only drive and react like a person can. Our current traffic is made up of millions of individuals that usually drive faster than they can realistically keep track of their surroundings. And they have almost no communication with each other. If we connect our self driving machines as part of a larger whole and equip them with the sensors and processing power to react properly then most of the issues we currently have would disappear. Instead of thinking about how a self driving car decides who dies, we need to look at ways to make them able to avoid having to make these decisions at all. For example, program the car in our experiment to keep a proper stopping distance behind heavy vehicles with open loads. The accident in question could be avoided by simply applying the brakes on the cars immediately behind, and merging cars further back into other lanes. Have the central traffic system flag the accident site once the boxes stop moving and send clean up vehicles.

youtube AI Harm Incident 2021-07-31T08:5…

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	none
Reasoning	consequentialist
Policy	industry_self
Emotion	indifference
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_Ugzslwt9QiheJpWRbfp4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxcu2cWNWH8_geonwJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwXxgUBr-1VnhEAZzd4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwugIWuRy3J137G9j14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx2e0zPvlz0YqnvIjZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxvMPLnc85qWm1CCV14AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxcvVkDSDnxfMmBnS94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwSIBvE8zK_FrylW6d4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxTbdc_xoYz5h6zmE54AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwIxDwsTLHdFBsCgnx4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}
]

Raw LLM Responses