Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Don't wanna be that guy, but the AI kinda nailed it. It was still my favorite co…
ytc_UgzF_82OT…
G
Imagine learning art for 5 years just to draw a silly little picture of a cat. L…
ytc_UgzBXKrPm…
G
A.I. came up with her look by a compilation of the most popular girls on Reddit.…
ytr_Ugxk_ohjI…
G
@juliagisella ai art always has its flaws yes it can look very good but it has n…
ytc_UgxalYk22…
G
i feel like the only one who wouldn't be mad at a robot revolution. especially i…
ytc_Ugj0NJzDL…
G
Oh wow, Geoffrey Hinton, the 'Godfather of AI' says we've lost control. Well tha…
ytc_UgzwMfmIC…
G
0:00:00
Exploration of Animal Communication and AI's Impact
0:06:50
Impact of…
ytc_UgxjW6Riw…
G
If the western public at large after reading this woman's book or listened to on…
ytc_UgyEigaaF…
Comment
The thing with that particular "hallucination" "how many strawberries in R" is it's almost like it's compensating for the user mis-speaking "how many R's are in strawberry?" Almost as if it thinks the person is dyslexic or something.
While I question whether AI's can truely become intelligent (by our own determination of intelligent). . .
I have thought for some time that there needs to be a kind of over-mind or another routine of some kind that examines possible answers and also either another thought center that can bring differing ideas together to combine them, or build it into the over-mind somehow. Sorry, I lack the vocabulary to explain my idea.
When you feed an AI a bunch of books, by Albert Einstein for example, it teaches the AI some things, but it does NOT teach the AI how come by those things itself. In other words, it doesn't make the AI an Albert Einstein. Which is in itself an interesting case in point as Albert explained how he formed his thought process.
The trick is how do you make a machine that thinks like an Albert Einstein and not just spew out knowledge it was fed. AI's are amazing, but you must remember (at least in their current incarnation) that they are basically over-glorified databases. (possibly understated.. =) )
I'm not saying their bad, I'm just pointing out...
youtube
2025-11-07T21:4…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyPENHm8nttBYyog8x4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwVMlPN66H4ujPYBwx4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx0bVcznkDOms2rEzF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxofFY44puJdtb-ixl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzanZnHhANC7GhGbRV4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxBId35OZPaLaOAmV14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw7qzFp2MGrAS1AcpV4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwNPYZC7pSTwHWMnUB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxa4KLoV8bx0nh-iGx4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxTQZzqUx7F2rXrskd4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}
]