Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Is ChatGPT-5 much better than o3? 5-mini much better than o4-mini? I think that …
rdc_n7pgz1q
G
How the hell are we all letting this unfinished, unreliable and endlessly wrong …
ytc_UgxDO8-dg…
G
Elon Musk wasn't fucking around when he said AI is far more dangerous than nucle…
ytc_UgzKf5dU1…
G
AI is a much bigger issue than guns. It affects everyone, and has led the top 1%…
ytr_UgzYz2k3W…
G
People will do other things like rioting, looting, murdering, and stealing. We w…
ytc_Ugixbnk4r…
G
If God exists and he created everything and is omniscient, omnibenevolent and om…
rdc_cxktkq3
G
We appreciate your feedback. Indeed, in this scripted dialog, the questions and …
ytr_UgyA1pJMF…
G
Ol'DirtyBastard rolling in his grave that he can't even rant honestly. As for A…
ytc_UgzmqPTQv…
Comment
Am I missing something or would it not require businesses as a whole to willingly adopt any ai technology in order for it to be of worth and if employees decided to not work with ai the benefits could not be realized or the business as a whole would fail. Therefore it’s like having a great tool but if it’s not widely accepted because its adoption is recognized as a poison pill for the masses, it would not work as expected. If you force employees to use it or lose a job as ai embeds in business, the employees would see a zero sum game and not engage. A company can’t fire all its employees at once unless there is a guarantee of success. With ai it requires ongoing usage to learn and perfect itself so the workers have a say in how it needs to be developed and leveraged with full transparency or the economic benefits will take longer to arise and will give more opportunity for the population to become clearer on the negative impacts and become more aggressive against establishing a framework in businesses to eliminate their jobs.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-12-12T02:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | industry_self |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzEoQcLAfOLHCUBy8V4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyXYG9qNLQDTTa6M8N4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxjYkXY300ZZ5354It4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyi8k2yGmCwy-0CeKV4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxq2__8wlWwzDLJwOx4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy_u-Opf6Gf8eXVecR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxZ6qpoeyII3W1w-Mp4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxUFW4CtOJqmYuf6pt4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzldA48Rz_HBGA8Ggx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw5iQaSZjJOIAvGREV4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]