Raw LLM Responses

For anyone that wants to understand why UBI seems logical: Universal Basic Income (UBI) is the only logical end conclusion to eventually all work being done by AI and robots. When robots that gather resources are built by robots and those robots build the power companies and all construction work, and also robots built can do all work needed by humans, then it would all be 100% automated and no need for anyone to be in control of the resources, because the resources would be managed by an ASI (Artificial Super Intelligence) which would be far better at managing what gets harvested and what gets built than any human would be capable of. If everything was 100% free, someone may decide they want all the gold or all the trees cleared in the country and things like that would threaten to destroy everything. However, if people are all being given money to buy all necessities and extra money for luxuries, then there is no need for any jobs. This is not going to happen tomorrow or in a week or a few months. I'm talking about at the VERY VERY END of humans being needed to advance technology and society. When AI becomes AGI which becomes ASI which will automatically conduct scientific research in the real world, to find out all possible knowledge without a human needing to prompt it to do so and it know more than any human on earth, so that it would know how to be the absolute safest way possible to conduct only scientific tests/studies/chemistry that would be safe. Until then, enjoy the ride and hope we live long enough to experience complete freedom. Also, I think we might have to develop multiple forms of money, because entertainment, such as visiting a zoo or going to see a movie on a big screen and other things, I don't think should come from the same credits for buying food. It should be setup so that EVERYONE gets all the food/drink/shelter/heathcare they need and also have money to spare. I also strongly believe that in the end future, that the laws should be changed by an un-biased perfect ASI so that they are fair, because there are many laws that would be improper for a completely free society, a society who's only responsibility in life is staying healthy and having fun and working on hobbies. I believe that as long as humans are in charge of other humans, we will always have humans telling other humans how to live their life. With humans being in charge of other humans, there will always be unfair laws that are meant to give power to certain people to legally harass people they don't like. With unbiased ASI, there would be no reason to keep or create any laws that cause people to be treated unfairly and unequal. Just to be clear again, I'm talking about at the end, when AI becomes AGI and then ASI and no human could jailbreak or hack the ASI because it would understand everything every human understands, plus understand all the things humans do not know. As to if this ultimate goal is possible or not, I am not going to claim it is guaranteed. For all we know, with AI, there might ALWAYS be flaws that are impossible to remove and therefore never reach the point it could be trusted to run the world. We know things will improve, but nobody knows 100% if it can be pushed completely to ASI or not. I personally think it is likely ASI will be created, and likely in my lifetime. The one thing I know about AI, is that the perception for the amount of time advancements take, is easy to get wrong repeatidly or even always.