Raw LLM Responses

It so funny that AI bros like saying "we don't need artists anymore" and laughing at the artists that they meaninglessly struggle to maintain their job. But what they fail to understand, that their "creative tool" are constantly feed real artists work, that their "AI art" is just a robot analyzing real artist's work and make the most probable decision based on this. Their art won't live if artist put down their pencils. Because without real people work, AI can't be trained. It either be stuck on this level of acceptable looking slop, that looks good enough for the bystander, or start to train on AI generated images and begin to deteriorete. All in all, AI art is just stolen work, and without something to steal, there won't be AI art, what AIbros fail to understand. For them AI is convenient, because they don't need to put effort, and what is generated is good enough to pass. We can cry that, hey, this art don't make sense, there is no intention behind this slop and this character have 6 fingers, but, let's be real, as long as it looks believable enough, consumers don't care how mach details make sense. If general pic is clear enough, they don't care. No one looks at the art longer then 2 seconds or close enough to notice anyway. And that is the reality.