Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
It’s way easier to say “we’re cutting jobs due to AI” than “we’re cutting jobs a…
ytc_UgwvCFLr0…
G
To make a devil's advocate argument (don't worry I agree with you here, I'm just…
ytr_Ugy9lGmov…
G
You literally are creating a system that will be our downfall. I don’t think it …
ytc_UgxBPRGBe…
G
Lol I dont agree with A.I. but to not have to work and do whatever you want in l…
ytc_Ugw-OQNVw…
G
This is what AI should’ve been doing instead of stealing art or the call center …
ytc_UgyDSyVJy…
G
I was going to say I don't disagree with hating robots & ai which are 100% made …
ytc_UgzYVfQ10…
G
Ban these 4th shredding evil demon cams. Dim the eyes of the AI beast or be ensl…
ytc_UgyldwJAV…
G
@user-sm4gx4gt8: Thank you for the comment, Future Predictor! Don't worry, with …
ytr_Ugzdj2_58…
Comment
Hey at around 11 minutes you start to talk about "reasoning models" and how AI has "thoughts" - my understanding is that this is actually a huge misnomer, these AIs do NOT use these thoughts at all to generate the text (and chat gpt seems to agree with this when you ask) - these chain of thought bubbles are actually used 1. as a diagnostic tool by LLM researchers to try to understand the text generation of the AI and 2. To give you something to read while it figures out what needs to be generated. The "chain of thought" bubbles have been shown in some models to have completely made up daydream reasoning while making errors in the thought that show that the "thought" was never used in the actual answer generation. I have seen it called "chain of thought drift" or "decoupled chain of thought" where the model is just throwing some text at the chain of thought because you want it to.
Not saying that no models consult their own chain of thought to generate an answer but at least cgpt self indicates that it does not.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2025-10-31T01:0…
♥ 2
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxcH58RRZU1U15_cQ14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwZDBpQXi5RhcM4Zjt4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyB-j9zxdB8jMz3cS94AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugymdsy0iFBh4TdLQwh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwfGyKf3hyd9KY8Y414AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzfbgBu_DyFNx-Qkrh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgylAF-k1dwxc4iM3xd4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwyCl8PYJoE4ZrkwSJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxPAlFOZf5P9-yFXq14AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx2DZPPy0JmWnTf_XF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]