Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
it is totally irrelevant whether ai becomes conscious or not. What matters is ho…
ytc_Ugwue8HTf…
G
Artists should have to opt in, not opt out of AI models - your suggestion uses t…
ytc_Ugyggs1f6…
G
@chuck9483 oh nobody said that it's not. Ofc AI will continue to develop as no o…
ytr_UgyFAfEXf…
G
AI apps will be ugraded from time to time and will have more realistic videos. T…
ytc_UgyhgpiBz…
G
Hi Bernie, I don't need you to tell me what being a human being means. If you're…
ytc_UgxDe8gQG…
G
Waymo is a lot better and a lot safer. Tesla is not ready and putting a lot of…
ytc_Ugz_FnjB8…
G
Actually, AI is making significant advances in the world of medicine, it's amaz…
ytr_UgyrYDaoI…
G
Hehehe, I remember a time when we were sounding the alarm over AI and artists an…
ytc_UgyRHwGNk…
Comment
The way it works it wouldn't really be able to credit. Maybe if you input someone specific style the person posting can add credits. It also costs money since it is very resource intensive. You can run it on your own PC if you have a beefy enough GPU. Sites and apps that sell the service of AI art generation are running on a lot better and very expensive hardware.
So, selling the service of generation is not necessarily a bad thing, but selling generation of their specifically trained model that is based on stolen work is pretty stupid. Even NovelAI stole code from Automatic1111 and claimed he stole their code. Caused a big drama in the SD community.
Personally, i think a company should train an AI based royalty free images and paying artist to provide images specifically for training. It would cost a lot to artist to provide many images to make their model better. Then they can sell that service to generate non stolen art generations to businesses to generate art for their commercial uses.
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2022-12-31T02:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | industry_self |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_UgwEIFAaYd5ANttHhZ94AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz54lOkzAI0StqjJrR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyoCaVCx0mp16IL9st4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxNzKYv1I5NRVub-yl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwimMxSyQZuan09CJh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwWVfuJd0GU3KA0xWl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxLIcLyg4kXcqBZJTl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyYTVxa8xISzK9HUWF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxZNtlQ66pGlVySygN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyksHqF_eXFGqqwIDF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}]