Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Idk something about it you can just tell its AI. The eyes and the lighting look …
ytc_UgwcAlGaD…
G
> If you give it enough context.
You know, that context would have been _alr…
rdc_oi0f6e2
G
I asked Chat GPT the question posed in this video and here was it's answer which…
ytc_UgxDGLuIn…
G
Also look at when russia went into battle did you see the amount of automated gu…
ytc_Ugw8W6At1…
G
Yea i'm with you but there's no way you're going to get any of your ideas implem…
ytc_Ugxpu0HkA…
G
Doomerism is as much hype as "Look what 'AI' can doo, woooooo!"
Skynet (AGI) isn…
ytr_UgwkzE9id…
G
That ChatGPT is chatting like a real individual. It doesn't chat like that norma…
ytc_UgxXqo6Lr…
G
We'll reach a point when AI will become exponentially more complex than humans e…
ytc_UgwCFMbzT…
Comment
ChatGPT is biased in several ways. First, is localization. It appears to be more censored in English than other languages. For instance, in portuguese it didn’t have much problem admitting that it makes sense for society to be organized as a traditional patriarchy, wilst in English it wouldn’t make "categoric statements" regarding this topic.
That said, it also appears to be biased towards you. In portuguese i noticed that it tried to agree with whatever I said as much as possible. In english not so much but more because of censorship.
I asked it to debate my christian monarchistic views. In English, it presuposed the convention mainstream views of european monarchy as being oppressive, while in portuguese it was more nuanced (likely because the brazilian republic was instituted through a violent coup against the Royal Family, and this republic has never worked ever since, thus giving more grounds for arguments against democracy and enlightenment ideas).
youtube
AI Bias
2025-06-22T22:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugxog2SH4IRI3JtRyOV4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxHWDRux0VijN-xQ7Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxq9TyLQJD-v1Pil8Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwHnNxPvTvEgGPFPct4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz8eqcpZ7VJiTOEzcB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxvUngIwux1B-c331p4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyyyuENXPODSqyc8Fd4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzauHiYKApwNOh_EJp4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzPFR0x5uOnpS6wF0N4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxeonuereLMGDKjpA14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"}
]