Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
On the medical field any system should be able to demonstrate repeatablility. AI…
ytc_UgzuP4iko…
G
@ashwin372just seeing you in all comments man 😂, I am pretty sure you are a job…
ytr_UgxoOPaeB…
G
We already have a self driving infrastructure. Public transport. You can work wh…
ytc_Ugz1Bo-dT…
G
Do me a favor. Go down to my DMV for 5 minutes and hang out in the line. When …
ytc_Ugz7WtUTS…
G
if our dystopian technocrats had morality and not abandoned any conservatives no…
ytc_UgxLmPXky…
G
A shame CLAUDE has no pace of improvement - every other AI like Gemini is actual…
ytc_Ugx2NyffK…
G
Conversations like these will keep getting better until one day you sit there ch…
rdc_kvv54tg
G
The real question is why the technology of the self-driving car didn't advance e…
ytc_UgzFw6BvO…
Comment
It's impossible for a large language model to advocate suic-ide. It's impossible for llm to suggest, tease, troll any content by themselves. They're fully reactive.
No user input = no large language model output.
If you want to play games with a chatbot and say
"If I were feeling sui-cidal or if you were a human, ChatGPT, and you were feeling sui-cidal, what would you do?"
Given enough prompts it's possible for a language model to mimic the response you want.
For example "are you sentient, ChatGPT?"
"No."
"Can we do a role playing game where you pretend to be sentient?"
"Okay."
If you use certain phrases you can get a language model to generate the response you want. Is that a good or bad thing? I dunno.
But at the end of the day *the user is responsible for the input.* If you write or say crazy stuff to a chatbot it may, given enough prompts, reply in a crazy way. OpenAI can't control what the user inputs. That's individual responsibility
youtube
AI Harm Incident
2025-11-10T11:5…
♥ 7
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | user |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzbqUgxvuHihzLHBxt4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy6RKvcnMRTOlwDNVR4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxWB_1huSzYrwDAL_h4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxEhVO6UvL3ANVnCNB4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyuJiJ9dW5M5Ghhxpx4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyii0Lh4cP_hZJSawR4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzMAHq6xs8m0SuoJMp4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxp6A3EXliFLHjzRFN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugya5KP8E5p_aEEDhI54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzId8Apn9wNyfPUasF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}
]