Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
If I find out my own son deepfaked me, he would have to go to the orphanage. I’l…
ytc_Ugwav-7hE…
G
The thing with AI is a quick way to do the boring stuff but it will be very unif…
ytc_UgxHlrgG1…
G
Democratizing knowledge is a fancy way to say stealing. Ai is not intelligent. I…
ytc_UgxsGiDhD…
G
Of course these companies want you to believe that so they can charge you for fu…
ytc_Ugx9oeseb…
G
AI is still super recognizable though, and some people might consider you a chea…
ytr_Ugxa8futL…
G
Why does it say hot robot? Why not just robot? Even female robots are sexualized…
ytc_UgzdQ7X9j…
G
Tesla has fewer crashed than any other type of vehicle control. The safest form…
ytc_UgznrKt-U…
G
@Snowyamur9889 No. We need these AI bros to stomp on some serious top big dogs t…
ytr_UgzTQVb5h…
Comment
Can AI be used by others for nefarious purposes, absolutely. But as for AI becoming dangerous or having it's own motivations, absolutely not. He describes himself as a 'materialist'. In other words he believes intelligence and consciousness is simply an emergent property of a complex system. I don't believe that at all, and there is the distinction. That is why I believe (along with those that think like me) that AI will only ever be able to mimic consciousness and sentience, it won't actually possess it.
What's the difference? Well I suppose the difference will be less relevant as time goes on and it becomes better and better at synthesizing true consciousness, but the point is AI systems will always need direction, they cannot 'think' for themselves, they are not and will not ever be 'alive', they are simply algorithms and will always be algorithms.
I suppose it boils down to a philosophical argument. But this guy speaks a bit like Richard Dawkins, he's a very materialist 'scientific' thinker. You just don't get the full picture from people that think that way.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-06-18T10:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxAO_IOCVQbhMk9u-h4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxABc89wKbgMpL749R4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyOIzl7JK7i_rKNpsV4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzmV2aSnT-b56-y4Vp4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw9pPkyRYE8ZydFldx4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx_xR9HrcZOASvOEAJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwTgVeDUcviOfuVPq14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyaF67rd2yp5Rkv3-F4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzgH5TaGiHsTH7E53d4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz_zz4W7muLyeBReKR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}
]