Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I highly doubt AI is going to be this powerful given power requirements to run A…
ytc_UgxogfysG…
G
Sorry, but this is just another step in automation of our societies. I didn't se…
ytr_Ugxxzqeey…
G
If AI doesn't kill us all, I will write music, regardless of the impact of the A…
ytc_UgyTqcXLI…
G
AI will take the easy hardware jobs first, such as office tasks, then ones with …
ytc_UgyNhZN9r…
G
You mean by openai you mean Sam Altman lets not eat around the bush ❤…
ytc_UgwFij5u5…
G
45:26 and that's why they push ai on kids, they need them to grow up illiterate …
ytc_UgzAi5e3c…
G
You should not talk to it at all. It’s lies, manipulation, and data mining dress…
ytc_Ugx8KN8JQ…
G
I dont care how automated they get, I want a human in each one to supervise and …
ytc_UgwY43111…
Comment
In my view, the "Chinese Room" is NOT POSSIBLE outside thought experiments. We cannot use it to say AI doesn't understand, as that assertions is not scientific once you analyze the thought experiment. Its' core premise is entirely flawed. There is no 'book of phrases' that could ever hope to convincingly make the person in the room seem fluent in Chinese, it would have to be nearly infinite in size, containing every possible response to every possible combination of questions assemble with language, or the user would have to spend an incredible amount of time, essentially learning Chinese in the process.
Prior to LLMs, which are the thing in question here, even our best language translation software could not convince a fluent speaker. So you cannot say AI is the only example of a Philosophical Zombies. Philosophical zombies do not exist outside thought experiments either. There is no example of any such thing in our natural world, and AI cannot be the only example, or we are proving nothing. It's not a comparison.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2025-07-10T15:3…
♥ 4
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugyw8YT20Q93sMTVqNd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxHj_F15n6L0vIlwl94AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxGSOXZqbDo-VM41fR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwSCBfrFaxcq7IkS114AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzE_xZAPqlnU0jeMXN4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwzaevmGpm74yW6ahp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxFQAV87LRPzQMo34V4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzsm2L8syPTfvMgXY54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyY7r-hzdYKAnqrklp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgznkdvbfX0SK_mfQLt4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]