Raw LLM Responses

What if you didn't learn it wasn't made by a human? Would you question the certain mark in a certain place and enjoy it as much as you would enjoy a human made picture? What if it was made by a human, presented as AI, and then when all interest was lost it was revealed the image was human made all along. Would the interest come back? Maybe art is only real art if made by humans. But then we have that elephant painter. In this case is the elephant art not real art?Is becoming an artists myself really the easiest way for me to understand? The reason for the mark placement in the AI art isn't only because it's the most probable, there is noise added to make the images different, depending on the rng source used you could have AI art generated with true random entropy sourced from earth's atmosphere or outer space, it may not be real art but it has interesting aspects at least. And while the struggle is fun, the scripted is interesting in it's own way, you can appreciate the entire journey of someone learning a speedrun, and the theoretical perfection of a TAS run. While I absolutely do support artists I disagree that AI art is bad by definition, my opinion is that it's a tool that should be used to aid creative endeavours and as a piece of entertainment. Models made with unlicensed art and the people running them should be prosecuted and shutdown, absolutely, you go for the people using the tool the wrong way, not for the tool itself.