Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I genuinely hate how AI, something everyone assumed would take away the boring j…
ytc_Ugwwe5Ds8…
G
@codirennke1109 yes. We can teach it that humans and AI will be synergistic. But…
ytr_Ugw1xJd33…
G
AI "artists" out here making hundreds of dollars selling AI images and we are si…
ytr_Ugx9SjPlZ…
G
If someone saw it example my bro
MYBRO:BRO U TALKED TO MAKIMA KAFKA FUBUKI YOR …
ytc_Ugx4F5ROU…
G
There is no chargpt or a.i its all programs from men and wemon in an office some…
ytc_Ugw-3dxs-…
G
Ah small thing,people would spread out ,grow there own garden feed themselve,sto…
ytc_UgwxvP8xp…
G
Ai more like untalented stealing of images to fake you can do anything while the…
ytr_UgyrfGWk1…
G
My employer looked into AI in 2023 and was unimpressed. That was the word they u…
ytc_UgzoB15R1…
Comment
The empirical method is most reliable in finding truth in the physical world. It employs the logic of mathematics in finding most probable outcome given a controlled set of variables. Religions are not concerned with that, and often depend upon intuition, emotions and customs not dependent upon objective reality found in scientific endeavors like physics.
Given that it is generally understood in the scientific community that the universe came from a single massive event, to begin to understand where we came from, there must be a theory that has reliable, predictive ability,
There is always the unknown (or "God of the gap"), like when questioning the origin of the initial mass; but that is not required in order to posit the question, "Given initial conditions like a single mass (nothing can be simpler or more ordered the one), aka,, 'cosmic egg' or 'primal atom,' how did that initial mass (generally accepted as most probable by all of the scientific community) transform to become the universe seen today?"
Again, there is no 100% certainty. The closest to that is found in abstract math. In application there is always a uncertainty, like when counting apples,.
There are two most-probable, very basic answers to "The Question," ie, top down cosmology OR bottom up cosmology-- both are incompatible with one another.
Given this, top down cosmology, when properly understood, is broad enough to predict everything so far seen. like that by the JWST, for example, while bottom up (Big Bang or Standard Model) cosmology must be constantly revised with ad hoc explanations every time there is a new finding, top down cosmology wins!
Top down is not properly understood, because it is commonly interpreted to mean that there are many realities caused by cascading events; but this is not the case, because everything seen and unseen remains causally connected by quantum entanglement.
"The universe is not locally real (Nobel Prize already awarded)."
Do not be deceived. Basic understanding of the universe comes before all else.
Religion or science? Choose!
PS: AI just may be the critical mass or "one-hundredth monkey" needed for a dramatic paradigm shift.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-07-22T15:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | unclear |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | unclear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxALpHS7YkG_rWQoXF4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxl9AzofNxpOOoSiMJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxjSE10eJCfoRvxuNl4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy__zuHMejuSbCTDqd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwxjO2Hj17Bh-4FzlJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwnPi92dN6gjSBaapp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxsm_p7N1BtTOnzfxt4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy0DEhBy4fMmv7wtRd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwdqpg-_NHNV9GKEQd4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz4JFN25TQczsJ8PUh4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}
]