Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
M-m-Morty huh? Learning some m-m-machine learning? Your grandpa rick would be p…
ytr_Ugy_FVI8-…
G
They're using AI and backed by governments because they want to use it to LEARN …
ytc_UgzEyHy36…
G
I work for software company and the whole projects getting over Ai, right now al…
ytc_Ugz2qILgW…
G
No plumber or electrician is getting UBI or AI to physically help them. Time for…
ytc_UgxCZU-EJ…
G
The ones that made us sad this shit didnt work out in long run everyone can have…
ytc_UgxHMf4M7…
G
I am so glad you wrote “Robot” on the screen, otherwise I would’ve felt so sorry…
ytc_Ugw4rLoJS…
G
Thank you for your comment! It seems like you are referencing the popular scienc…
ytr_UgyUHb9M6…
G
@enadegheeghaghe6369 You have no idea either. I'm most likely correct though, i…
ytr_UgwdywlWQ…
Comment
I am in complete agreement with Dr. Roman, especially when it comes to super intelligence. I find the implications of super intelligence to be terrifying and a threat to the human race. Narrow intelligence, as we have now can be very beneficial to the world. Super intelligence will threaten humans inevitable extinction. Robots don’t need to be fed. They work 24 seven etc. etc.. I have been thinking about how we could program AI and stop super intelligence from destroying the human race Women have an instinctive protection mechanism for their children, just like a she bear will do anything to protect her Cubs if she feels them threaten in any way. In order to protect the human race from extinction, is it possible that we could somehow program AI to incorporate that instinctive protection so that they would not destroy us and look up upon us the same as she bears do with their Cubs and humans do with their children? What do you think of this idea as a security measure against super intelligence?
youtube
AI Governance
2025-09-04T19:0…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | fear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugx_bV1jwLAjuNilkOl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxeb0e3BsIISpa6Qr54AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"confusion"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwTDdEgXsZ7_fOv1OV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgztFGr4QwQqe2QA7kR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyfMH21s_XWjLyY2Sx4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwWStSA1qosnBpGQvR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyjkcyiXxGHu13gCAt4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwx79llVT16gbB0P6Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxsGLDsfs5jZMktyDh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxJXvUbV2lGnUpDP-B4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]