Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
8:53 yea but again, if someone really wanted to crash into you it wouldn't be wi…
ytc_UgxNouW0S…
G
What if God(s) created humans in his/their own image and ultimately humans broug…
ytc_UgyzcberY…
G
Pretty scary, humans watching AI replace humans and not giving a fuck bc “it’s n…
ytc_UgwIqZv9-…
G
to be fair, SheikhGPT, you should have allowed it to counterargue any individual…
ytc_Ugz2inoqo…
G
What is with this new conspiracy that reducing costs only results in higher prof…
rdc_jw5m8uo
G
It would be very interesting, to do a series where you’re talking with sort of a…
ytc_UgwJghFlD…
G
You never really know what’s AI or not anymore, AI Image Detector makes that par…
ytc_UgxVi00iD…
G
Fcking Draconian. The damage is done when the young man is arrested-regardless …
ytc_UgwvVbipw…
Comment
The funny thing is, there are actually generative AI models that have licensed their training data properly. Their only downside is, because they had to license basically all of shutterstock and similar services these are not cheap AI models. On the upside, these models can't be poisoned like the scraper models. Because artists and photographers who are being paid for their original work have no reason to try and poison their images. The AI models are also generally better, because shutterstock and similar libraries have very comprehensive meta tagging on all of their images.
But hey, if you want to be an AI "artist" grifter, why would you ever pay for an AI model? Paying for your materials is such a liberal arts school graduate loser thing to do, right?
Frankly the only thing that the free generative AI models are good for is generating a fake ID to bypass photo ID requirements on websites these days. The AI checking the photo is so incredibly bad that it can't tell the difference between an actual photo and AI slop.
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2025-11-11T17:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyGX4z1HV11D4PFCjl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy8ImXZ8U28V_zeJ314AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxjxGPS2QXzfV6gi9B4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwu9ISK8wu1kk3CIRl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwXCPW0H61vSQEUiTR4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxdCsPIqh1lViH8o9x4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwPXpbpwNo2iPsFp-F4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx7Dmzb6j8xo7xEalt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx8m0452fKMTPWvWD14AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw0fSD_QERGpkoJ0bt4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}
]