Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I’ve been doing this at home with my 8 year old. He’s in line to graduate highsc…
ytc_Ugym7PyNE…
G
With all due respect, every time I hear the words 'AI' and 'safety' in the same …
ytc_UgzB-TKpb…
G
That's the problem.
This type of work should be paid its weight in gold. Have co…
ytc_Ugz3o6AFP…
G
Im so glad were not just taking the chance with one AI either but with multible …
ytc_UgzM472GS…
G
Humans must agree to limit the architecture of Agentic AI systems to those with …
ytc_Ugyfv3_yc…
G
AI scenes mimic dream sequences so well that I genuinely hope the technology doe…
ytc_Ugz3Nxz8W…
G
Only The One Trick Ponies:::: Humans will take the Dumbest Animals in the heard…
ytc_Ugz9TMACL…
G
EM warns of the dangers of AI, then creates a way to become enslaved by said dan…
ytc_Ugz0GyAWr…
Comment
The funny thing is, there are actually generative AI models that have licensed their training data properly. Their only downside is, because they had to license basically all of shutterstock and similar services these are not cheap AI models. On the upside, these models can't be poisoned like the scraper models. Because artists and photographers who are being paid for their original work have no reason to try and poison their images. The AI models are also generally better, because shutterstock and similar libraries have very comprehensive meta tagging on all of their images.
But hey, if you want to be an AI "artist" grifter, why would you ever pay for an AI model? Paying for your materials is such a liberal arts school graduate loser thing to do, right?
Frankly the only thing that the free generative AI models are good for is generating a fake ID to bypass photo ID requirements on websites these days. The AI checking the photo is so incredibly bad that it can't tell the difference between an actual photo and AI slop.
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2025-11-11T17:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyGX4z1HV11D4PFCjl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy8ImXZ8U28V_zeJ314AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxjxGPS2QXzfV6gi9B4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwu9ISK8wu1kk3CIRl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwXCPW0H61vSQEUiTR4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxdCsPIqh1lViH8o9x4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwPXpbpwNo2iPsFp-F4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx7Dmzb6j8xo7xEalt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx8m0452fKMTPWvWD14AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw0fSD_QERGpkoJ0bt4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}
]