Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Your perspective on art gives me so much joy. Please hold on to that love as muc…
ytr_UgzX80jiW…
G
If AI were to become autonomous and decide to eliminate humanity, considering th…
ytc_UgwkvaIPr…
G
Do AIs lie? Of course they do - when a person meets another person they think "O…
ytc_UgxGJ5ac-…
G
There have been some studies. But the only way to really measure it accurately w…
rdc_fdf7hhn
G
Vous voyez de vos popres yeux c est quoi profiter
Qd les africains en veulent au…
ytc_Ugxj9kXz3…
G
You enjoy the fear that you see in the people’s eyes 👀 fear makes you more power…
ytc_UgxS4dSPZ…
G
I think overall generative art is used by people who want art but don't respect …
ytc_Ugz2uup5l…
G
You seem salty that AI feed raw data will come to conclusions leftists don't lik…
ytc_Ugzf0Yc1W…
Comment
The writing in NaNo’s statement is bad, which is interesting coming from a group centered around writing. It’s not just grammar or tone: it’s clarity. It feels as though in different sections of the statement they are defending different uses of AI in writing without specifying, leaving the reader to intuit that they are defending the most egregious use of ai for writing—generating the manuscript itself—throughout the whole thing.
To me, it appears that in the classism section they are defending editing with ai, which is seen as slightly more acceptable by some writers, and they may have been able to salvage some of their tone problems by being clearer. That does nothing to save the horrendous attitude of the piece. The ableism section was clearly not researched or looked at by another writer critically, and ruins the writer’s ethos.
Criticism of Ai writing and classism, ableism, and racism are just not comparable. Apples and oranges. They picked an aggressive, shockbait tactic and it shows in the quality of their work.
youtube
2024-09-08T17:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | unclear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugxkr-6nUBFLj-UEe314AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxeNvFFEceDXD3IVyt4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzV-bdGmYIALTkmGiZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwkUlt7z0UdI2QtlM54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxhCUXxWbWCRxnmhkl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxX2_k2PdqBbKc2cUR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwqvyOHf_rvrOfpTfx4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzSpfkzvueT4VWOTc94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwt1jDmcqEBNsTa_cB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyV0QT6oKoJxdbNzc14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}
]