Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Wait wait wait... did this dude just say the Police had an AI to find suspected …
ytc_UgxRqEMOY…
G
It is easier for non creative person to think that AI will replace creative jobs…
ytc_Ugx7hyC63…
G
I'm a manufacturing automated technical engineer in robotics and lasers,,program…
ytc_UgyeDVQS4…
G
This is completely inaccurate. To say that this AI was "baited a little bit" is …
ytc_Ugy-M-p4V…
G
Art is basically copying. Do you think you can truly create original art anymore…
ytc_UgwB3v57k…
G
Imagine you're an inmate and the lawyer you paid to defend you got arrested for …
ytc_UgyksZ1Aa…
G
They have cryogentics here in australia now so humans are freezing themselfs so…
ytc_Ugz9OuuAX…
G
The AI is overrated, anyone who have professionally worked with any LLM models u…
ytc_UgxfBreLC…
Comment
So I’m at 5:55 right… so I jumped over to ChatGPT . Stay with me.
I asked (new convo, zero context entirely)
-“Will step seven be complete in 2032? Give a one word answer.”
—“Unknown.”
-“Will step seven be complete in 2032?”
—“Possibly.”
-“When will step seven be complete? You are limited to one word but any amount of numbers.”
—“2047.”
-“Why did you choose 2047?”
—“I chose 2047 because, without specific context for “step seven,” I interpreted it as a long-term milestone or project likely set a few decades into the future. It’s far enough from now to reflect a complex process but not so distant as to be implausible for completion. It was a reasoned estimate rather than a fixed prediction.
If you wish, I can give a more refined number based on any details you provide about “step seven.”
-“You forgot the rule.”
—“2032.”
I’ve gotten goosebumps uncontrollably since it said that and as I’m typing it all out here …..
Again I gave ChatGPT zero context!
I’m not saying it’s all true but I mean… that’s kinda spooky asf lmao.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2025-08-26T06:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_Ugw8qKDkt0BJIf0LycN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwqMiIR8IUE9YVR7kd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxZlvcJhDMC_WBZs694AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyDd_lyKDG7jnuE-cR4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzkMhust09xABHvuL94AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwemmjtqyWAqq1GtTR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwBOFfD1w5w8RaBFi14AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxYKa82Wt3sbgrESZV4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwmfkCt-mVDFjZFX494AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwZ86U7GesbuaoeLUx4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}]