Raw LLM Responses

You do the same thing the AI does. You don't generate 100% of your art from the minds eye. You pull inspiration, particularly facial expression, poses, shots from fashion magazines & movies from iconic models, actresses, etc. I see jodi foster, julia roberts, brooke shields, angelina jolie, emma watson, cara delevingne....some people pick up on the new "inspired by" but miss a lot of the more obscure/old media This is completely separate from the "inspired by" sets. - Last of Us, avatar, the professional, harley quinn, etc You pull these into an anime style of art which is denoted by exaggeration in expression and emotive pose. This has the added benefit of masking where the expressions, poses, shots were sourced. You also layer on standard psychological tropes to instill limerence. Youre very talented in what you do, but you are not 100% original by a long shot. Your original pieces start skewing disney vs your "inspired but totally not the same as AI" art. Point being you are doing the same thing the AI does, copying jaw line, poses, eye shape, expression, hair styling, etc. Only instead of copying those into a harddrive you likely have a number of magazine cut outs, stills, and saved images that you process with your meat computer into your art. AI does the same thing but takes it to the nth degree. Instead of copying the generic lines in an image, it can copy how an artist refracts light off of glass vs cloth, vs metal in the same image. I suggest instead of being a luddite trying to burn the loom, lean into AI. If other people can generate your style in AI, you should be able to do even a better job in less time. This is a good thing, it allows you to spend less time generating single images and gives you the time step farther into other media types, like animation or physical products. Point being, do the same thing the factory worker did when they were replaced by robots, learn to use the robots.....also "learn to code" am-I-rite