Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
> AI for businesses is entirely different.
Uuh, watch out, "military grade" …
rdc_mrrn8h6
G
I feel like we're unironically just destined to go this route, intelligence inha…
ytc_UgyCxlrrW…
G
at least they are upfront about their robot usage. no robot butlers, no robots s…
ytc_Ugy_KgM__…
G
I really don't think its ethical to implicitly lump LLM-induced psychosis in wit…
ytc_Ugy5Y-sto…
G
After reading the transcript, this was a case of someone seeing what he wanted t…
ytc_UgyYAOwN3…
G
They’ll keep us around simply because of entertainment value. If you get rid of …
ytc_Ugw_OHGb3…
G
At 0:34 you discuss not being cruel to AI. This makes me think of the uplifting …
ytc_UgzE8gN4n…
G
Bias = the wrong opinions (hes a censor to remove what they regard as hate speec…
ytc_Ugxc8rEGT…
Comment
While was kinda impressive the AI calling out some of the fallacies, that's about it, to me, the AI still lost the discussion
It contradict itself with its own answers, some of its answers refute it's past answers and later answers, and a lot of them were very shallow, it was simply "regardless of what you say, I still think it's a hotdog" and "I will still call it it's own thing", it's straight up stubbornness
I do know he asked the AI the opposite what he says, but it doesn't make the arguments any good, I wasn't expecting the AI to say it lost the debate, but seriously, the arguments are way too shallow, if it was a real person and not an AI I know that was told to disagree, I would simply not talk with someone like that again, there are people like that, that like to be contrarians, and talking to a wall seems to be less of a waste of time than talking with someone like that
I simply expected a bit more from the argumentung skills of the AI or hoped for it to not contradict itself, but like always, AI continues being stupid
youtube
2026-02-08T18:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | unclear |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | unclear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_Ugzc61wt73fG6R3ujk54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},{"id":"ytc_UgzTsUjORpwqZl2NAs94AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},{"id":"ytc_UgzCcHOTApA_R1i5-Up4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},{"id":"ytc_Ugwlb_MZLZWPuSKe-ip4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},{"id":"ytc_Ugxl5xUrwSweWst7DHZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},{"id":"ytc_UgwNaPQACkVx3rxzoBB4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},{"id":"ytc_UgxzNd3FUL9_f842wBF4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},{"id":"ytc_UgzSW9BxAeWM6eFPa0l4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},{"id":"ytc_UgwQN9VXwD0mkpdcj6l4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},{"id":"ytc_Ugz7VatROY9hRnKkXkN4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"})