Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
One thing to remember is, if they had sentient AI, they'd do just as they did he…
ytc_Ugy7wM4YB…
G
This comment has inspired my new response to ai slop creators. I am now just goi…
ytr_UgwHAlbm8…
G
I genuinely hope that the ai devs appreciate all the effort you boys put in to i…
ytc_UgyZfijVT…
G
Wonderful trick ,they’d never do that for real like use an ai double for him in …
ytc_Ugxv38mtu…
G
Government spying? Maybe. But with swell robotics everywhere, Ai jobloss is the …
ytc_Ugz0vWGeQ…
G
Imagine a child trying to ask its parent a string of trick questions in a prejud…
ytc_UgyqQjJ4Q…
G
He reminds me of Richard Stallman. If Stallman had access to a sentient AI, he w…
ytc_UgyRdJPtU…
G
Could either of them get job in AI?? NEVER. - Neither of these two guy are qual…
ytc_UgxoL4rYd…
Comment
While I agree that AI art shouldn't be copyright protected, your reasoning is way off and displays a lack of understanding of how Ai image generation works. It's a very intricate process of fine-tuning the base models (which requires deep understanding of machine learning and sometimes weeks of work curating datasets) and then optimizing your workflow, from learning what prompts even work, to masking, inpainting, detailing, upscaling, post-processing, which are all highly manual tasks. A proper, release-worthy AI image takes hours of work and months or years of experience and staying up-to-date with the tech behind it.
According to the logic in this video, you couldn't copyright a photo that has a filter slapped on top of it, because the filter wasn't made by you. You also couldn't copyright any software at all - after all, you're just giving instructions to a compiler via code, just like you just give instructions to an image generator via prompts and workflows. It's silly.
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2024-10-01T16:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxXeqrWkfB_ZZE3AVN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwzNPTot_5lWKVOayZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwTzLZHSBco5udDafR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwt5oBgisqjlW2xe314AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwTl0iMch0aq_2QpMh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwknY855jOqzZHxhyp4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwjUrmHN1tuFJ8zXA14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx8brbHzeQWrLrMRyt4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy3E2aGH9HwPb1iOch4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy6uzAj3u68tj1mA5h4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"none","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]